Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Weir v. Galbraith, 376 P.2d 396.

42 citing documents.

Triple E Produce Corp. v. Valencia 824 P.2d 771 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Triple E Produce Corp. v. Valencia 824 P.2d 771 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Peruskov 800 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Peruskov 800 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Able Distributing Co. v. James Lampe 773 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Able Distributing Co. v. James Lampe 773 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Reeb v. Interchange Resources, Inc.
Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Arizona Bank 650 P.2d 435 Ariz. 1982
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Arizona Bank 650 P.2d 435 Ariz. 1982
DES, however, , as authority for the view that the courts have held that plaintiff should have judgment for all funds held by the garnishee, and that the garnishee would have to seek reimbursement of the answer fee from the defendant.
Davidson-Chudacoff/Kol-Pak of Arizona, Inc. v. Pioneer Hotel Co. 630 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Davidson-Chudacoff/Kol-Pak of Arizona, Inc. v. Pioneer Hotel Co. 630 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Obviously, a judgment subject to reversal on appeal is subject to a contingency- D/C argues, however, , that if the debt “matures” after the writ is served, the writ is effective as to such “maturing” debts.
West v. Baker 510 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
West v. Baker 510 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
ve days, deliver a copy of this judgment to the Bank of El Paso with instructions to attach the copy to the promissory note dated March 1, 1967, executed by Mary West, payable to Aritex.” In considering the problem presented by this appeal, it may be first observed that under Arizona law, garnishment reaches installments on a contract which mature after the service of the writ, -288 , -102 (1962).
Valley National Bank v. Brown 508 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Valley National Bank v. Brown 508 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Farragut Baggage & Transfer Co. v. Shadron Realty Inc. 501 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Farragut Baggage & Transfer Co. v. Shadron Realty Inc. 501 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Reeb v. Interchange Resources, Inc. of Phoenix 478 P.2d 82 Ariz. 1970
Reeb v. Interchange Resources, Inc. of Phoenix 478 P.2d 82 Ariz. 1970
O’ , , Gillespie Land & , , 224 P. 808 (1924); , 222 P. 1046 , (1924).
Reeb v. Interchange Resources, Inc. 473 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Reeb v. Interchange Resources, Inc. 473 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
As authority for his position, , wherein the court held that the indebtedness referred to in the garnishment statute must be an indebtedness which is “due” at the time of the service of the writ and cannot be contingent on the occurrence of any act or event.
City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc. 472 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc. 472 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
55(b) (1) is designed to protect a party “ * * * has appeared in the action * * While a garnishment proceeding is always ancillary to the main or principle action, , it is a necessary conclusion from McClintock, supra, that a garnishment proceeding is itself an “action” for the purposes of 55(b) (1).
Limon v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 465 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Limon v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 465 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
National Life & , ; , Mutual Benefit Health & , ; Scottish Union & National Insurance Co. v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co., , 235 P. 137 (1925); , 218 P. 990 (1923).
Mid-State Electric Supply Co. v. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. 464 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1970
Mid-State Electric Supply Co. v. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. 464 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1970
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
O'LEARY v. Superior Court of Gila County 452 P.2d 101 Ariz. 1969
O'LEARY v. Superior Court of Gila County 452 P.2d 101 Ariz. 1969
Kuffel v. United States 441 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1968
Kuffel v. United States 441 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1968
Henderson v. Las Cruces Production Credit Ass'n 435 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Henderson v. Las Cruces Production Credit Ass'n 435 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
There are two Arizona cases which are cited by all parties to this appeal
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Sandoval v. Chenoweth 428 P.2d 98 Ariz. 1967
Sandoval v. Chenoweth 428 P.2d 98 Ariz. 1967
State v. Allred 425 P.2d 572 Ariz. 1967
State v. Allred 425 P.2d 572 Ariz. 1967

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by