Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Company, 346 P.2d 1101.

108 citing documents.

Stuart v. Winslow Elementary School District No. 1 414 P.2d 976 Ariz. 1966
Stuart v. Winslow Elementary School District No. 1 414 P.2d 976 Ariz. 1966
Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Co., , , , .
Board of Medical Examiners v. Schutzbank 383 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1963
Board of Medical Examiners v. Schutzbank 383 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1963
we stated: “This Court has held that, where a jurisdictional notice is required to be given in a certain manner, any means other than that prescribed is ineffective.
City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of Tempe 368 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1962
City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of Tempe 368 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1962
Zoning finds its authority in the police powers, Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Co., , , while eminent domain is the right and power in a sovereign state to appropriate private property to uses for the public good.
City of Phoenix v. Fehlner 363 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1961
City of Phoenix v. Fehlner 363 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1961
Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Co., , .