Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ward v. Stevens, 344 P.2d 491.

61 citing documents.

Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima 439 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1968
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of Cochise 438 P.2d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of Cochise 438 P.2d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Superi- *280 or Court, 6 Ariz.App.
Leiby v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 421 P.2d 874 Ariz. 1966
Leiby v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 421 P.2d 874 Ariz. 1966
we said: “It is noteworthy that the only situation in which a change in the jurisdiction of judges of the superior court was to be effected by said amendment was when a judge from one county was sitting as a ‘visiting judge’ in another county ‘at the request of the judge of the superior court thereof’
State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 420 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 420 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
A , in which decision our Supreme Court set aside, in a certiorari proceeding, an order of a superior court judge, sitting in Maricopa county, staying a deposition to be taken in Maricopa county, but as part of the procedure in an action pending in Pinal county.
Sil-Flo Corporation v. Bowen 402 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1965
Sil-Flo Corporation v. Bowen 402 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1965
Appellee, however, , , erroneously asserting that it holds to the contrary; i. e., that the territorial jurisdiction of the superior court is limited to the county in which it is presiding.
Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court 370 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1962
Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court 370 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1962
We may, when a constitutional provision is not clear upon its face, consider extrinsic materials to ascertain the intent of the constitutional framers and the people who adopted the constitution