Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nordale v. Fisher, 380 P.2d 1003.

28 citing documents.

Eureste v. Berrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Eureste v. Berrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Rodriguez v. Placido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Rodriguez v. Placido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
We review the court's denial of a motion to continue for an abuse of discretion, and "affirm where any reasonable view of the facts and law might support the judgment,"
North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
North v. Vps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
3, 326, 11 NORTH et al. v. VPS et al. Decision of the Court ¶ 14 (App. 2011) (dismissal for failure to prosecute) (); ¶ 10 (App. 2003) (determination that party failed to show good cause) ().
Krenzen v. Katz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Krenzen v. Katz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ugalde v. Burke 65 P.3d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Ugalde v. Burke 65 P.3d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
(“[A] motion for continuance is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court predicated on good cause.”).
East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry 500 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry 500 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Kreisman v. Thomas, 12 Ariz.App.
Evans v. Lundgren 465 P.2d 380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Evans v. Lundgren 465 P.2d 380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 456 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1969
Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 456 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1969
Camelback Partners v. Weber 453 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Camelback Partners v. Weber 453 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Puente v. Lee 447 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1968
Puente v. Lee 447 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1968
plaintiff, in order to recover, must show that he was “the efficient, proximate and procuring cause of the sale.” In the instant case it would have been necessary to show that the broker procured the signed lease of the doctors which was one of the conditions of the agreement.
Ulan v. Richtars 446 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Ulan v. Richtars 446 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
A motion for continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, predicated on good cause, , and we see no abuse of discretion here.
Hackin v. First National Bank of Arizona, Phoenix 427 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Hackin v. First National Bank of Arizona, Phoenix 427 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Yarbro v. Neil B. McGinnis Equipment Co. 420 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1966
Yarbro v. Neil B. McGinnis Equipment Co. 420 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1966
Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products Company 401 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products Company 401 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965