Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite McKeever v. Phoenix Jewish Community Center, 374 P.2d 875.
- Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. and Bertha Sanchez v. Tucson Orthopaedic Institute Levi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
-
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. and Bertha Sanchez v. Tucson Orthopaedic Institute Levi
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Ctr., (plaintiff failed to establish defendant had exclusive control of swimming pool where decedent plaintiff drowned); (res 7 ipsa did not apply where unexpla
- McDonald v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 757 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- McDonald v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc. 757 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Jackson v. HH Robertson Co., Inc. 574 P.2d 822 Ariz. 1978
-
Jackson v. HH Robertson Co., Inc.
574 P.2d 822
Ariz. 1978
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 328D, Comment b. The necessary conditions for a , : “(1) the accident must be of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of some one’s negligence; “
- Byars v. Arizona Public Service Company 539 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Byars v. Arizona Public Service Company 539 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc. 501 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
-
Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
501 P.2d 440
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
215 , where we recognized and relied on 2 Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 299A (1965) for the standard of care required towards one relying on professed expertise
- Lewis v. Cooley 480 P.2d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Lewis v. Cooley 480 P.2d 370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Davis v. Farmers Pump Co. 469 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- Davis v. Farmers Pump Co. 469 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- Compton v. National Metals Company 459 P.2d 93 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
-
Compton v. National Metals Company
459 P.2d 93
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
1 A.L.R.3d 957 (1962); Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.
- Arnold v. Frigid Food Express Co. 453 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
Arnold v. Frigid Food Express Co.
453 P.2d 983
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
See, , , 1 A.L.R.3d 957 (1962); Beliak v. *475 Plants
- Schneider v. City of Phoenix 452 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
-
Schneider v. City of Phoenix
452 P.2d 521
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
1 A.L.R.3d 957 (1962); McCarthy v. Kenosha Auto Transport Corp., 2 Ariz.App.
- Tucson General Hospital v. Russell 437 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- Tucson General Hospital v. Russell 437 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- Beaty v. Jenkins 414 P.2d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
-
Beaty v. Jenkins
414 P.2d 763
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
In going forward with his proof plaintiff must still prove proximate cause and show that no injury would have resulted but for some sort of negligence on the part of defendant.” , , 1 A.L.R.
- McCarthy v. Kenosha Auto Transport Corporation 411 P.2d 58 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
-
McCarthy v. Kenosha Auto Transport Corporation
411 P.2d 58
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Restatement (Second), Torts § 328D, comment b; , , 1 A.L.R.3d 957 (1962).