Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Day v. Estate of Wiswall, 381 P.2d 217.

57 citing documents.

Pima County Assessor v. Arizona State Board of Equalization 987 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Pima County Assessor v. Arizona State Board of Equalization 987 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners 949 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners 949 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Heinig v. Hudman 865 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Heinig v. Hudman 865 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rosen v. Rae 647 P.2d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Rosen v. Rae 647 P.2d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Summit Properties, Inc. v. Wilson 550 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Summit Properties, Inc. v. Wilson 550 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
While the surrounding circumstances and merit of a suit must be evaluated in determining the applicability of this concept, Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , there must be an unreasonable delay after knowledge of the facts which works a hardship.
Agricultural Employment Relations Board v. United Farm Workers of America 548 P.2d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Agricultural Employment Relations Board v. United Farm Workers of America 548 P.2d 429 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Krumtum v. Burton 532 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1975
Krumtum v. Burton 532 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1975
Spur Feeding Co. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARICOPA CTY. 505 P.2d 1377 Ariz. 1973
Spur Feeding Co. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARICOPA CTY. 505 P.2d 1377 Ariz. 1973
Bates v. Mallamo 504 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Bates v. Mallamo 504 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
329 , Day v. Wiswall’s Estate
West v. Baker 500 P.2d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
West v. Baker 500 P.2d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
World Investments, Inc. v. Estate of Harber 490 P.2d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
World Investments, Inc. v. Estate of Harber 490 P.2d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Great American Insurance v. Fred J. Gallagher Construction Co. 494 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Great American Insurance v. Fred J. Gallagher Construction Co. 494 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
the court held that an - existing final judgment rendered upon the merits, without fraud or collusion, by a court of competent jurisdiction, is- conclusive as to every point decided therein, and also as to every point raised -by-'the record which-could have been decided, with respect to the part
Read v. City of Scottsdale 489 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1971
Read v. City of Scottsdale 489 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1971
Di Orio v. Scottsdale, 2 Ariz.App.
Application of Stone 481 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Application of Stone 481 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , State v. Forteson, 8 Ariz.App.
Weller v. Weller 480 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Weller v. Weller 480 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Finger v. Beaman 480 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Finger v. Beaman 480 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Day v. Wiswall 464 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Day v. Wiswall 464 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Visco v. Universal Refuse Removal Company 462 P.2d 90 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Visco v. Universal Refuse Removal Company 462 P.2d 90 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., etc., , ; Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , ; State Automobile &amp
Meyer v. Warner 448 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1968
Meyer v. Warner 448 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1968
State ex rel. Talley v. Jones 444 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State ex rel. Talley v. Jones 444 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
240 , Day v. Wiswall’s Estate
Garcia v. Frey 442 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Garcia v. Frey 442 P.2d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Just as augmentation of the record on appeal has been permitted to include extrinsic evidence consideration of which would have the effect of affirmance, Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , we deem it equally appropriate here, where we are called upon to determine whether the superior court acted beyond its jurisdiction or abused its discretion in failing to quash this service.
Mozes v. Daru 420 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Mozes v. Daru 420 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., etc., , Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , State Automobile & , ” , wherein the Supreme Court of Arizona expressly stat
Swansea Properties, Inc. v. Hedrick 416 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Swansea Properties, Inc. v. Hedrick 416 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., etc., 100 Ariz.-, Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , State Automobile &amp
Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966
Lawless v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 415 P.2d 97 Ariz. 1966
Lawless v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 415 P.2d 97 Ariz. 1966
Day v. Wiswall’s Estate, , State Automobile &amp
Di Orio v. City of Scottsdale 408 P.2d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965