Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Long v. Dick, 347 P.2d 581.

68 citing documents.

Arizona State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. Phoenix Union High School District 424 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1967
Arizona State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. Phoenix Union High School District 424 P.2d 819 Ariz. 1967
Dick, , , 80 A.L.R.2d 949 .
Mirkin v. School District No. 38 421 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Mirkin v. School District No. 38 421 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
This is made clear by Harkins v. School District No. 4, , , , 80 A.L.R.2d 949 (1959).
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Company 409 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1966
State Ex Rel. Lassen v. Harpham 410 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Company 409 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1966
80 A.L.R.2d 949 , petitioner Robert H. Long brought the following action: "Petitioner, a resident of Maricopa County, Arizona, and a real property taxpayer in the Buckeye Union High School District, filed this original application in mandamus to compel respondent, the State Superintendent of Public In
State Ex Rel. Lassen v. Harpham 410 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Phoenix Title & , , , 80 A.L.R.2d 949 (1959).
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co. 401 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co. 401 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
§ 15-1212, requires that the computation be based on attendance, rather than enrollment, , , 80 A.L.R.2d 949 (1959).
Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. Warren 398 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. Warren 398 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1965
The rule is well settled in this jurisdiction that the contemporaneous construction of a statute by those officials charged with its administration is entitled to great weight in arriving at its proper interpretation, , , 80 A.L.R.
City of Mesa v. Killingsworth 394 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1964
City of Mesa v. Killingsworth 394 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1964
Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise County 377 P.2d 770 Ariz. 1963
Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise County 377 P.2d 770 Ariz. 1963
Appellees urge upon us that where a. statute is ambiguous we will not disturb-long established administrative interpretation and the acts of public officials predicated thereon, , , 80 A.L.R.2d 949 ; Maricopa County v: Trustees Ariz. Lodge, , .
Jenney v. Arizona Express, Inc. 362 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
Jenney v. Arizona Express, Inc. 362 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961