Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gillespie Land and Irrigation Company v. Gonzalez, 379 P.2d 135.

50 citing documents.

Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
See Gillespie Land & (holding that a landowner may be strictly liable for damages caused by diverting natural waters or flood waters onto neighboring and downstream properties); (same); (stating a landowner may be strictly liable for
South West Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Central Arizona Water Conservation District 212 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
South West Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Central Arizona Water Conservation District 212 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(landowner may not divert the natural waters of a stream in a manner that floods his neighbor's land).
SAL Leasing, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Napolitano 10 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
SAL Leasing, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Napolitano 10 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Scholten v. Blackhawk Partners 909 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Scholten v. Blackhawk Partners 909 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Taft v. Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. 818 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Taft v. Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. 818 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 v. Warford, , Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 v. Roosevelt Irrigation District
White v. Pima County 775 P.2d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
White v. Pima County 775 P.2d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
City of Phoenix v. Superior Court 762 P.2d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
City of Phoenix v. Superior Court 762 P.2d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Pochiro 736 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Pochiro 736 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich 726 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich 726 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Bahman v. Estes Homes 710 P.2d 1087 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Bahman v. Estes Homes 710 P.2d 1087 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
That “a landowner may not divert the natural waters of a stream in such a manner that these waters, combined with flood waters, cause damage to his neighbor” is found in Gillespie Land &amp
Reeves v. Markle 579 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1978
Reeves v. Markle 579 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1978
In objecting to the testimony, , and Schmidt v. Gibbons, 3 Ariz.App.
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
Hemet Dodge v. Gryder 534 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hemet Dodge v. Gryder 534 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Gillespie Land & , , ; , 276 P. 322 (1929).
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Smith 521 P.2d 1139 Ariz. 1974
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Smith 521 P.2d 1139 Ariz. 1974
State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
Hibner v. Gleason 408 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1970
Hibner v. Gleason 408 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1970
He further asserts that by reason of the foregoing there is a different standard of review which must be applied
Nordin v. Kaldenbaugh 435 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Nordin v. Kaldenbaugh 435 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Bullard v. Stonebraker 422 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1967
Bullard v. Stonebraker 422 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1967
City of Phoenix v. Schroeder, 1 Ariz.App.
State ex rel. Herman v. Wilson 422 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State ex rel. Herman v. Wilson 422 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State Roads Commission v. Creswell, 235 Md.
Schmidt v. Gibbons 412 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Schmidt v. Gibbons 412 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
the Arizona Supreme Court said: “It has been stated that an expert may not base his opinion upon the inferences and conclusions of others, Mt.
Diedrich v. Farnsworth 413 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Diedrich v. Farnsworth 413 P.2d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
196 P. 1024 (1921); City of Tucson v. O’Rielly Motor Co., , Maricopa County Municipal Water C. D. No. 1 v. Warford, , , 262 P.2d *272 252 (1953); , and Gillespie Land &amp
Kennecott Copper Corporation v. McDowell 413 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1966
Kennecott Copper Corporation v. McDowell 413 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1966
Defendant also argues that he was not 'liable for the resulting injury caused by the ■diversion as a “landowner is not responsible for his diversion of * * * flood waters * * * .” Gillespie Land & , See also, Annot.
Aguilar v. Carpenter 399 P.2d 124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Aguilar v. Carpenter 399 P.2d 124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
This court has limited power to reverse the action of a trial judge in granting a new trial for the reason that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, Gillespie Land & , , and will not set aside an order granting a new trial unless it is apparent that the trial court has abused its discretion.
Bass v. Renaud 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In Re Thompson's Estate 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In Re Thompson's Estate 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
A recent case, in a long line of such cases, , .
Bass v. Renaud 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
A recent case, in a long line of such cases, , .