Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stone v. Arizona Highway Commission, 381 P.2d 107.

229 citing documents.

Johnson v. SUPERIOR COURT, PIMA COUNTY 763 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co. 755 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Bussanich v. Douglas 733 P.2d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Bussanich v. Douglas 733 P.2d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
The defendant contends that in drafting the proposed amendment, the legislature apparently failed to consider the fact that the distinctions between public and private employees written into § 8
Evans v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections 678 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Evans v. Arizona Dept. of Corrections 678 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
the Arizona Supreme Court abrogated the doctrine of sovereign immunity and allowed suits for negligence to be brought against the state.
Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 690 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department 690 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
1335 at 1338 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1434 at 1440 (1959).” Although the immunity traditionally granted public officials has been diminished by recent Arizona case law, , , , judicial immunity has remained unscathed.
Ontiveros v. Borak 667 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1983
Brannigan v. Raybuck 667 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1983
Brannigan v. Raybuck 667 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1983
See, , (sovereign immunity abolished both for the Stone case and “all other pending cases, those not yet filed which are not barred by the statute of limitations and all future causes of action”).
Ontiveros v. Borak 667 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1983
Ryan v. State 656 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1982
Ryan v. State 656 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1982
However, a return to Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, , would make a good starting point.
Tovrea v. Trails End Improvement Ass'n 634 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tovrea v. Trails End Improvement Ass'n 634 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
City of Scottsdale decided one year before Stone is still the law.
Bill Moore Motor Homes, Inc. v. State 629 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Bill Moore Motor Homes, Inc. v. State 629 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Recognizing this fact, we think that the public-private duty dichotomy is a shield very much like the shield of governmental immunity
Cady v. State 630 P.2d 554 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Cady v. State 630 P.2d 554 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
After acknowledging the abandonment of the doctrine of sovereign immunity ( , the court noted that a prospective plaintiff still needed to prove the elements of actionable negligence.
Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College District 611 P.2d 547 Ariz. 1980
Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College District 611 P.2d 547 Ariz. 1980
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, supra
Lowman v. City of Mesa 611 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Lowman v. City of Mesa 611 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
(dips in street); , (improper highway mark *592 ers); , (dips in street); , (raised section of public sidewalk); , (lack of guardrails be
Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 607 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 607 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Although appellant argues that appellees Arizona City Sanitary District and Arizona City Improvement District No. 1 may be liable for the failure of the general contractor to pay his claim, , abolishing the rule of governmental immunity from tort liability.
Tanner Companies v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 601 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1979
Tanner Companies v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 601 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1979
there was no cause of action against the state for negligence, i. e., the sovereign had not consented to the imposition of liability.
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 599 P.2d 777 Ariz. 1979
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 599 P.2d 777 Ariz. 1979
DeHoney v. Hernandez 595 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1979
DeHoney v. Hernandez 595 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1979
Bagley v. State 595 P.2d 157 Ariz. 1979
Bagley v. State 595 P.2d 157 Ariz. 1979
Ever since this court’s decision to abolish the doctrine of governmental immunity, , the courts have been troubled with the problem of where government’s liability begins and ends.
Lewis v. Wolf 596 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Lewis v. Wolf 596 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
is an example of common law judges in their finest hour.
DeHoney v. Hernandez 594 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
DeHoney v. Hernandez 594 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
*317 In tort actions against a government body, although the defense of governmental immunity has been abolished, , the elements of liability still must be established, just as in an action against a private individual.
State v. SUPERIOR CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA 585 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1978
State v. SUPERIOR CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA 585 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1978
1 , is cited as authority for the proposition that this Court is free to effect “substantial justice” and disregard the mandatory wording of A.R.S.
State v. Sanchez 579 P.2d 568 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Sanchez 579 P.2d 568 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
abrogated governmental immunity for tortious conduct.
Lake Havasu Irrigation & Drainage District v. Dubois 573 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Lake Havasu Irrigation & Drainage District v. Dubois 573 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
119 , See also Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm ’n, , the landmark case in Arizona abolishing state governmental immunity for failure to maintain safe conditions on highways and reaffirming the prior Arizona Law that breaches of that duty by cities is actionable.
McGeorge v. City of Phoenix 572 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Wesley v. State 571 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
McGeorge v. City of Phoenix 572 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Wesley v. State 571 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
opened the way to tort liability against the State and its instrumentalities.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by