Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pride v. Superior Court, 348 P.2d 924.

40 citing documents.

Butler Law v. Hon. higgins/winslow Memorial 410 P.3d 1223 Ariz. 2018
Butler Law v. Hon. higgins/winslow Memorial 410 P.3d 1223 Ariz. 2018
Behrens v. O'Melia 78 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Behrens v. O'Melia 78 P.3d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Lakritz v. Superior Court 880 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Lakritz v. Superior Court 880 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
at 362 , 533 P.2d at 573 (fraud and misrepresentation); -03 , (slander); -61 , (tort action for injuries arising from automobile collision); Zucker-nick, 140 Ariz. at 606 , 684 P.2d at 178 (conversion).
Cacho v. Superior Court 821 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1991
Cacho v. Superior Court 821 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1991
Zuckernick, 140 Ariz. at 606-07 , 684 P.2d at 178 -79 ( , ).
Zuckernick v. Roylston 684 P.2d 177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Zuckernick v. Roylston 684 P.2d 177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Bishop v. Marks 570 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Bishop v. Marks 570 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Tribolet v. Fowler, supra
Jackson v. Superior Court 533 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Jackson v. Superior Court 533 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
McKinney v. Superior Court 509 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
McKinney v. Superior Court 509 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Sherrill v. Superior Court, 16 Ariz.App.
Cohen v. Superior Court 484 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Cohen v. Superior Court 484 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Ray v. Sommer 481 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Ray v. Sommer 481 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Massengill v. Superior Court, 3 Ariz.App.
GAC Properties, Inc. of Arizona v. Farley 481 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
GAC Properties, Inc. of Arizona v. Farley 481 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Marsh v. Hawkins 437 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Marsh v. Hawkins 437 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Smitherman v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CO. OF PIMA 433 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1967
Smitherman v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR CO. OF PIMA 433 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1967
162 , the court held that to constitute a trespass within the meaning of the exception there must be an “affirmative act.” , , we said: “The courts of Texas (from which state our venue statutes were principally taken, , 194 P. 88 , 12 A.L.R.
Dunn v. Superior Court of Arizona 427 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1967
Dunn v. Superior Court of Arizona 427 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1967
Smitherman v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Smitherman v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 461 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Our Supreme Court has indicated that because this statute was adopted from the State of Texas we will accept the holding of Texas courts that the word “trespass” includes actions traditionally known as “actions of trespass on the case.”
Massengill v. Superior Court 416 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Massengill v. Superior Court 416 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Turner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY FOR PIMA 415 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Turner v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY FOR PIMA 415 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Brown v. Superior Court 409 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Brown v. Superior Court 409 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Defendant does not gainsay that this is an action in “trespass.”
Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and Maricopa 409 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and Maricopa 409 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Among these decisions are: , , , 70 A.L.R.2d 1336 (1959)
Ellsworth v. Layton 397 P.2d 450 Ariz. 1964
Ellsworth v. Layton 397 P.2d 450 Ariz. 1964