Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Beliak Ex Rel. Beliak v. Plants, 379 P.2d 976.

53 citing documents.

Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Concerning closing arguments, “[t]he rule is that wide latitude is allowed in the discussion of facts supplied by the evidence and the inferences to be drawn therefrom.”
Liberatore v. Thompson 760 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Liberatore v. Thompson 760 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Ahmed v. Collins, 23 Ariz.App.
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Goubeaux 664 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. Goubeaux 664 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1983
Bliss v. Treece 658 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1983
Bliss v. Treece 658 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1983
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
Jordan v. Jordan 643 P.2d 1008 Ariz. 1982
Watson Construction Co. v. Amfac Mortgage Corp. 606 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Watson Construction Co. v. Amfac Mortgage Corp. 606 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Hales v. Pittman 576 P.2d 493 Ariz. 1978
Hales v. Pittman 576 P.2d 493 Ariz. 1978
Emp. Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'n 565 P.2d 1300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission 565 P.2d 1300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission 565 P.2d 1300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Moreover, , further conditioned the applicability of the “law of the case” to instances “where the evidence on a second appeal is substantially the same .
Emp. Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'n 565 P.2d 1300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Moreover, , further conditioned the applicability of the "law of the case" to instances "where the evidence on a second appeal is substantially the same...."
Seely v. McEvers 564 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Seely v. McEvers 564 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. Shawler 558 P.2d 894 Ariz. 1976
Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. Shawler 558 P.2d 894 Ariz. 1976
Manner v. Raskin 545 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1976
Manner v. Raskin 545 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1976
Starkovich v. Noye 519 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Starkovich v. Noye 519 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Aguilar v. Carpenter, 1 Ariz.App.
Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. Perez 508 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. Perez 508 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Zugsmith v. Mullins, supra; , ; , Nelson *430 v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N.W.2d 561 (1953).
Wry v. Dial 503 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Wry v. Dial 503 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
City of Mesa v. Bradshaw 462 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
City of Mesa v. Bradshaw 462 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Collins v. Dilcher 450 P.2d 679 Ariz. 1969
Collins v. Dilcher 450 P.2d 679 Ariz. 1969
We do not think a litigant should be permitted to lie in wait, take chances on a favorable verdict and, being disappointed, sally from ambush and, for the first time, complain of an improper argument in the motion for a new trial.’ ” , , we said: “It is asserted generally that defendant’s-argument, ‘among other things, consisted of accusations, wholly unwarranted by the evidence, that the plaintiff, his family, his witnesses and his counsel misrepresented evidence and presented false evidence in
Kelch v. Courson 447 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1968
Kelch v. Courson 447 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1968
Heaton v. Waters 445 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Rail N Ranch Corporation v. State 441 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Rail N Ranch Corporation v. State 441 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Graham County Electric Co-op., , In re Monaghan’s Estate, , , 291 P. 1003 (1930).
Kelch v. Courson 439 P.2d 528 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Kelch v. Courson 439 P.2d 528 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Myers v. Rollette 439 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1968
Myers v. Rollette 439 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1968
Myers v. Rollette 429 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Myers v. Rollette 429 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Alires v. Southern Pacific Company 409 P.2d 714 Ariz. 1966
Alires v. Southern Pacific Company 409 P.2d 714 Ariz. 1966
State v. Adams 400 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
State v. Adams 400 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Beliak v. Plants (1963) , ; Aguilar v. Carpenter (1965) 1 Ariz.App.
City of Phoenix v. Camfield 400 P.2d 115 Ariz. 1965