Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Hernandez v. County of Yuma, 369 P.2d 271.
- Olewin v. Nobel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Olewin v. Nobel
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See id.; (“Dictum is not binding precedent .
- Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State 16 P.3d 757 Ariz. 2001
- Clouse v. State 11 P.3d 1012 Ariz. 2000
- Pritchard v. State 788 P.2d 1178 Ariz. 1990
-
Pritchard v. State
788 P.2d 1178
Ariz. 1990
2 , Recent Decisions, Governmental Tort Immunity Revisited: Ryan v. State, 25 Ariz.L.Rev.
- Guibault v. Pima County 778 P.2d 1342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Guibault v. Pima County 778 P.2d 1342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health Services 775 P.2d 521 Ariz. 1989
-
Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health Services
775 P.2d 521
Ariz. 1989
Perez v. Maricopa County, 158 Ariz. at 41 , 760 P.2d at 1090 ( , ).
- Perez v. Maricopa County 760 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- Perez v. Maricopa County 760 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- Ames v. State 694 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Ames v. State 694 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- G & S INVESTMENTS v. Belman 700 P.2d 1358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
G & S INVESTMENTS v. Belman
700 P.2d 1358
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
199 , 74 L.Ed.2d 160 ; , In re Moore’s Estate
- State v. Fahringer 666 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Fahringer 666 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- Lombardo v. Pollock 521 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Lombardo v. Pollock 521 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Farmers Insurance Group v. Home Indemnity Co. 481 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- Farmers Insurance Group v. Home Indemnity Co. 481 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- Patterson v. City of Phoenix 436 P.2d 613 Ariz. 1968
-
Patterson v. City of Phoenix
436 P.2d 613
Ariz. 1968
where we held that the county hospital would be liable for an employee’s negligence which resulted in injury to a “paying patient,” recognizing, in effect, governmental liability for the proprietary acts of the county.
- Watson v. Industrial Commission 411 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
-
Watson v. Industrial Commission
411 P.2d 455
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
On page 387 of the Arizona Reports, 381 P.2d on page 109, the court quoted the earlier Hernandez case [ , ] which quotation we paraphrase by omitting one word, namely the word “citizen” as follows: “It requires but a slight appreciation of the facts to realize that if the individual * * * is left to bear almost all the risk of a defective, negligent, perverse or erroneous administration of the state’s funct
- Stone v. Arizona Highway Commission 381 P.2d 107 Ariz. 1963
-
Overruled
Stone v. Arizona Highway Commission
381 P.2d 107
Ariz. 1963
: “It requires but a slight appreciation of the facts to realize that if the individual citizen is left to bear almost all the risk of a defective, negligent, perverse or erroneous administration of the state’s functions, an unjust burden will become graver and more frequent *388 as the g
- McQueary v. County of Yuma 369 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1962
- McQueary v. County of Yuma 369 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1962