Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Black v. Industrial Commission, 361 P.2d 402.

31 citing documents.

Bayless v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 880 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Bayless v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 880 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
But see Black v. Industrial Comm’n, -76 , overruled by Salt River Project, (precluding reopening because blood bromide tests concluded after protest period expired merely additional evidence concerning unchanged condition considered when case closed); Standard Brands Paint Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , 5
Perry v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 741 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Perry v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 741 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See, , Standard Brands Paint Co. v. Industrial Commission, 26 Ariz.App.
Payne v. Industrial Commission 664 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Payne v. Industrial Commission 664 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission 654 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Bell v. Industrial Commission 617 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Bell v. Industrial Commission 617 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Pascucci v. Industrial Commission 616 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Garrote v. Industrial Commission 589 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Garrote v. Industrial Commission 589 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Terrell v. Industrial Commission [ 24 Ariz.App.
Aetna Insurance v. Industrial Commission 563 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Aetna Insurance v. Industrial Commission 563 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Terrell v. Industrial Commission, supra.
Whitley v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 778 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Martin v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Whitley v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 778 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
See also Davila v. Industrial Commission, supra; , ; London v. Industrial Commission, supra; Godwin v. Industrial Commission, 15 Ariz.App.
Martin v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
White v. Industrial Commission, 7 Ariz.App.
Parsons v. Bekins Freight 493 P.2d 913 Ariz. 1972
Parsons v. Bekins Freight 493 P.2d 913 Ariz. 1972
Godwin v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 1257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Godwin v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 1257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Govan v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Govan v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Verdugo v. Industrial Commission 447 P.2d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Verdugo v. Industrial Commission 447 P.2d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Spicer v. Industrial Commission 411 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Spicer v. Industrial Commission 411 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
And, citing Rule 37 of the Industrial Commission : “This Court has consistently held that when such procedure is not followed within the specified period, the matter becomes res judicata.”
Davila v. Industrial Commission 403 P.2d 812 Ariz. 1965
Davila v. Industrial Commission 403 P.2d 812 Ariz. 1965