Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite McGuire v. Valley National Bank of Phoenix, 381 P.2d 588.

47 citing documents.

Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(citing McGuire v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Phx., ).
Rucker v. Quiktrip Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Rucker v. Quiktrip Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
McGuire v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Phoenix, -54 (1963).
Dulles v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 810 P.2d 627 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Dulles v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 810 P.2d 627 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Smith v. Delvin 728 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Koepke v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. 682 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Koepke v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc. 682 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
a ease heavily relied upon by Broadway.
Spelbring v. Pinal County 662 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Spelbring v. Pinal County 662 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc. 635 P.2d 1210 Ariz. 1981
Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc. 635 P.2d 1210 Ariz. 1981
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 20 Ariz.App.
Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Jackson v. Cartwright School District 607 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Jackson v. Cartwright School District 607 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
our Supreme Court affirmed a directed verdict for the defendant because the plaintiff was unable to prove how long the pebble which caused him to slip and fall had been on the stairway of the defendant’s building.
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Walker v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc., 20 Ariz.App.
Delarosa v. State 518 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Delarosa v. State 518 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., 20 Ariz.App.
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. 511 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin 475 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
El Grande Market No. Two, Inc. v. McAlpin 475 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc., , ; McGuire v. Valley National Bank, 94 Ariz. SO
Estabrook v. JC Penney Company 464 P.2d 325 Ariz. 1970
Estabrook v. JC Penney Company 464 P.2d 325 Ariz. 1970
ent d under § 343 explains that the “invitee is entitled to expect that the possessor will take reasonable care to ascertain the actual condition of the premises and, having discovered it, either to make it reasonably safe by repair or to give warning of the actual condition and the risk involved therein.” Arizona has adopted the restatement definition, , and applied it to relations between storekeepers and their invited clientele.
German v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 462 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
German v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 462 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
While as a general rule the employer of an independent contractor is not liable for physical harm resulting from an act or omission of the independent contractor or his servants ( , ; Restatement (Second) of Torts Sec.
Rhodes v. El Rancho Markets 454 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Rhodes v. El Rancho Markets 454 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
it was held that error is not reversible if it does not cause a material defect in the plaintiff’s case.
Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTS 449 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Vreeland v. STATE, BOARD OF REGENTS 449 P.2d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
McGuire v. Valley *63 National Bank of Phoenix, , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. 448 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1968
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. 448 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1968
Chesin Construction Co. v. Epstein 446 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Chesin Construction Co. v. Epstein 446 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 409, at 370.
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. 428 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc. 428 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
where a pebble-like substance was on a stairway because of the acts of third persons renovating the airconditioning system of the building.
Rhodes v. El Rancho Markets 418 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Rhodes v. El Rancho Markets 418 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
It would appear from the record that the trial judge, , directed a verdict in favor of the market because of appellants’ failure to show that appellee had either actual or constructive notice of the specific piece of lettuce being on the floor.
Safeway Stores, Incorporated v. Cone 406 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Safeway Stores, Incorporated v. Cone 406 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Welker v. Kennecott Copper Company 403 P.2d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Welker v. Kennecott Copper Company 403 P.2d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
[1963] ; § 409 of the Restatement of Torts.