Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc., 421 P.2d 507.

27 citing documents.

Bridges v. Nationstar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Distinguished Bridges v. Nationstar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Those cases involved a judicial foreclosure seeking the principal amount, Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc., or an acceleration clause that was automatically invoked when the debtor defaulted
Evitt-Thorne v. Hiatt (In re Evitt) 429 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Evitt-Thorne v. Hiatt (In re Evitt) 429 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 14-1102(B)(3) ; see also In re Estateof Winn , , 153, ¶ 20, , 240 (2007) ; Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. , , 491, , 510 (1966).
Miller Designs v. US Bank 418 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Miller Designs v. US Bank 418 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(citing Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc., ).
SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. Partnership 265 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. Partnership 265 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Malice, a required element of the claim, means acting “from improper motives or without reasonable belief in the efficacy of the claim.” Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.
In Re Estate of Van Der Zee 265 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Re Estate of Van Der Zee 265 P.3d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
at 504 , 83 P.2d at 1004 ; Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc., , (holding that suit filed within three months of rejection of amended claim filed with executor but not within three months from rejection of original claim was barred by the prior version of AR.S.
Estate of Page v. Litzenburg 865 P.2d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Estate of Page v. Litzenburg 865 P.2d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Accord Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.
Prevo v. McGinnis 689 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Prevo v. McGinnis 689 P.2d 557 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.
Ray Korte Chevrolet v. Simmons 571 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Ray Korte Chevrolet v. Simmons 571 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
180 , , (1970); Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.
Valley National Bank v. Southern Arizona Bank & Trust Co. 515 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Valley National Bank v. Southern Arizona Bank & Trust Co. 515 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.
In Re Estate of Pfeffer 492 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
In Re Estate of Pfeffer 492 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.
Stewart v. Fahey 481 P.2d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
England v. Ally Ong Hing 459 P.2d 498 Ariz. 1969
England v. Ally Ong Hing 459 P.2d 498 Ariz. 1969
As we stated in Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc., , : “We have consistently held that this court will be bound by the trial judge’s decision on matters of fact in a non-jury case as long as there is competent evidence in the record to support the finding.” 101 Ariz. at 490, 421 P.2d at 509.
Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. Hunter 442 P.2d 831 Ariz. 1968
Followed Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. Hunter 442 P.2d 831 Ariz. 1968
Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc., , .
Grant v. White 439 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1968
Grant v. White 439 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1968
These findings were amply supported by the evidence, , .