Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Spector v. Spector, 382 P.2d 659.

76 citing documents.

Heller v. Heller 438 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Heller v. Heller 438 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
“Attorney’s fees for the wife in a divorce action are within the sound discretion of the trial court.” 185
Nace v. Nace 432 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Nace v. Nace 432 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
As pointed out in the appellant’s brief, the wife’s right to receive $1,500 per month alimony is as “tenuous as a heartbeat.” Alimony is extinguished upon the death of the husband, , and may be reduced, or eliminated, in the light of changing circumstances, A.R.S.
State v. Chaney 428 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Chaney 428 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. Husband 426 P.2d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. Husband 426 P.2d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Ellsworth v. Ellsworth 423 P.2d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Ellsworth v. Ellsworth 423 P.2d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966
Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966
Tate v. Connel 416 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Tate v. Connel 416 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Warren v. Warren 407 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Warren v. Warren 407 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Wakeham v. Omega Construction Company 395 P.2d 613 Ariz. 1964
Wakeham v. Omega Construction Company 395 P.2d 613 Ariz. 1964
§ 25-211, the husband is in charge of the business affairs of the community.” , .
Britz v. Britz 389 P.2d 123 Ariz. 1964
Britz v. Britz 389 P.2d 123 Ariz. 1964
the decree appears substantially justified and well within the broad discretion granted by A.R.S.
Barnett v. Barnett 388 P.2d 433 Ariz. 1964
Barnett v. Barnett 388 P.2d 433 Ariz. 1964
Spector v. McFate 387 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1963
Spector v. McFate 387 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1963
On September 27, 1963, Eleanor W. ■Spector filed a petition for Writ of Man■damus directed to the Superior Court of Maricopa County and the Honorable Yale McFate, Judge thereof, to compel compliance with our mandate in Spector v. Spector, 94 Arizona 175, .
Babnick v. Babnick 385 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1963
Babnick v. Babnick 385 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1963
Examined in the light that this court must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence most favorably to upholding the decree, , the evidence is as follows: The husband, an orthodontist, is in his sixties and the wife in her fifties.