Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise County, 377 P.2d 770.

108 citing documents.

Bade v. Drachman 417 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
In dealing with similar contentions, , said: “Although the light of a legitimate grant of power for administrative action is *60 often quite dim, it may safely be said that a statute which gives unlimited regulatory power to a commission, board or agency with no prescribed restraint offends the Constitution as a delegation of legislat
Drachman v. Jay 417 P.2d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Drachman v. Jay 417 P.2d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
cted, and if the tax due is determined to be less than the amount paid, the excess shall be refunded in the manner provided by this chapter.” Plaintiffs’
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Company 409 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1966
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Company 409 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1966
Plaintiff appealed from a judgment granting a motion to dismiss counts one and two of its complaint, and this case was decided separately by this court in , .
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co. 401 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Cochise County v. Southern Pacific Co. 401 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
.” at 406 , at 778 (1963).
Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State 132 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1964