Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, 363 P.2d 930.

42 citing documents.

Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Smelting & Refining Co., (setting aside award where “the [Industrial] Commission arbitrarily disregards the only reasonable inference”), the evidence of causation in this case was anything but undisputed or uncontroverted.
Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
Such an election had been permitted, prior to 1973, in *514 cases such as Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , and Reilly v. Industrial Commission, 1 Ariz.App.
Phoenix Pest Control v. Industrial Commission 655 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Phoenix Pest Control v. Industrial Commission 655 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
See Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , , , Enyart v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App.
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1978
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1978
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co., , , ” Morrison-Knudsen Co.
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial Commission 566 P.2d 293 Ariz. 1977
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial Commission 566 P.2d 293 Ariz. 1977
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Arellano v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Arellano v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co., , Montgomery Ward Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App.
Marquez v. Industrial Commission 517 P.2d 1269 Ariz. 1974
Marquez v. Industrial Commission 517 P.2d 1269 Ariz. 1974
it was held that there was a causal connection between the petitioner’s asthma and pulmonary emphysema, or at least an aggravation thereof through the claimant’s inhalation of dust and smoke, and that this was compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
O'CONNOR v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
O'CONNOR v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Mengel v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Mengel v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co., , ; Montgomery Ward Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App.
Schlenker v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 680 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Followed Schlenker v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 680 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co., , Flores v. Industrial Commission, 11 Ariz.App.
Balbuze v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Balbuze v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , Flores v. Industrial Commission, 11 Ariz.App.
Collins v. Industrial Commission 471 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Collins v. Industrial Commission 471 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 445 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 445 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , , Colasacco v. Industrial Commission, 8 Ariz.App.
Russell v. Industrial Commission 402 P.2d 561 Ariz. 1965
Russell v. Industrial Commission 402 P.2d 561 Ariz. 1965
See also Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , ; , .
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company 399 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company 399 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Timely protest was made and in July, 1961r the Supreme Court of Arizona issued its opinion setting aside the award
Sanchez v. Industrial Commission 391 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1964
Sanchez v. Industrial Commission 391 P.2d 579 Ariz. 1964
See Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , ; Bierman v. Magma Copper Company, supra; , ; , .
Adkins v. Industrial Commission 389 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1964
Adkins v. Industrial Commission 389 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1964
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , ; , ; , .
Tatman v. Provincial Homes 382 P.2d 573 Ariz. 1963
Tatman v. Provincial Homes 382 P.2d 573 Ariz. 1963
we said: "Second, an industrial injury need not be the sole cause of death, in order to entitle decedent’s dependents to death benefits, as long as it appears that the injury contributed to and accelerated the inevitable.” *169 We also said in Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company, , , 933-934: “Dr. Steen’s concessions that the employment conditions constituted ‘a very very minor factor’ in precipitating or aggravating petitioner’s emphysema, coupled with the other overwhelming medica
Condos v. Industrial Commission 376 P.2d 767 Ariz. 1962
Condos v. Industrial Commission 376 P.2d 767 Ariz. 1962
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company
Edmiston v. Industrial Commission 375 P.2d 377 Ariz. 1962
Edmiston v. Industrial Commission 375 P.2d 377 Ariz. 1962
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Company