Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Trickel v. Rainbo Baking Company of Phoenix, 412 P.2d 852.

40 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Robert Charles Glissendorf 311 P.3d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
801(d)(1)(A); (noting witness’s inconsistent description of events “materially related to the subject matter”).
Rosen v. Knaub 857 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1993
Rosen v. Knaub 857 P.2d 381 Ariz. 1993
(no fixed criteria or standard for determining if an instruction is prejudicial; every case to be decided on its own facts).
Lane v. City of Phoenix 816 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Lane v. City of Phoenix 816 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Libra Group, Inc. v. State 805 P.2d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Libra Group, Inc. v. State 805 P.2d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Richey v. Western Pacific Development Corp. 684 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Richey v. Western Pacific Development Corp. 684 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Appellants' withdrawal of the lis pendens pursuant to paragraph C may have avoided treble actual damages, reasonable fees and costs, but viewing the sections in pari materia, , we do not construe that paragraph to disallow the attorneys fees allowed in paragraph A. In connection with appellants’ contention that the appellees’ counterclaim was made in bad faith, we find it to be without merit.
Bliss v. Treece 658 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1983
Bliss v. Treece 658 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1983
State v. LeMatty 590 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1979
State v. LeMatty 590 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1979
City of Scottsdale v. McDowell Mountain Irrigation & Drainage Dist.
Ordway v. Pickrell 543 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1975
Ordway v. Pickrell 543 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1975
Kearney v. Mid-Century Insurance Company 526 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Kearney v. Mid-Century Insurance Company 526 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
342 P.2d-195 (1959) ; , , Campbell v. Commonwealth Plan, Inc.
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Reiser 512 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1973
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Reiser 512 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1973
Arizona State Highway Comm’n v. Nelson
Killingsworth v. Nottingham 501 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Killingsworth v. Nottingham 501 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
See also, , wherein the court states: “Moreover, if appellants desired that only a portion of the statement be admitted, they should have so moved, which was not done and are thereby in no position to assert error as to this matter.” 100 Ariz. at 226-227 , 412 P.2d at 855 .
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
City of Tucson v. LaForge, 8 Ariz.App.
Stump v. Fitzgerald 484 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Stump v. Fitzgerald 484 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Arnold v. Frigid Food Express Co. 453 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Arnold v. Frigid Food Express Co. 453 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Marcus 450 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1969
State v. Marcus 450 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1969
Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court, etc., , ; , .
Esquivel v. Nancarrow 450 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1969
Esquivel v. Nancarrow 450 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1969
Since the case was tried, , , we held that “it is always error to give an instruction on unavoidable accident.” However, the above instruction makes the unavoidable-accident instruction even more objectionable, as the jury might conclude since the child was crossing at a point other than a crosswalk, it was an unavoidable accident
State v. Stone 443 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Stone 443 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
O'DONNELL v. Maves 436 P.2d 577 Ariz. 1968
O'DONNELL v. Maves 436 P.2d 577 Ariz. 1968
Fulton v. Johannsen 416 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Fulton v. Johannsen 416 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Gallagher v. Viking Supply Corporation, 3 Ariz.App.
Nichols v. Baker 416 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1966
Nichols v. Baker 416 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1966