Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Blende v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 393 P.2d 926.

28 citing documents.

Goodman v. Samaritan Health System 990 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Goodman v. Samaritan Health System 990 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
¶ 22 Private peer review in the context of acceptance into a private medical society came under judicial scrutiny in Blende v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 96 Ariz. *508 240
Limmer v. Samaritan Health Service 710 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Limmer v. Samaritan Health Service 710 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See Peterson v. Tucson General Hospital, Inc., , , Reiswig v. St.
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital 714 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital 714 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
After examining a , which held that where a doctor was denied membership in the medical society and was thus prevented from maintaining staff privileges in any hospital in Maricopa County, judicial intervention was justified because the control of a doctor’s access to hospital facilities was the exercise of a quasi
Reiswig v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 634 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Reiswig v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center 634 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Scappatura v. Baptist Hospital of Phoenix 584 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Scappatura v. Baptist Hospital of Phoenix 584 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Peterson v. Tucson General Hospital, Inc., supra.
Holmes v. Hoemako Hospital 573 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1977
Holmes v. Hoemako Hospital 573 P.2d 477 Ariz. 1977
Initially, let us say that the power of the Arizona courts to review the actions of a private, , and Peterson v. Tucson General Hospital, Inc.
Holmes v. Hoemako Hospital 573 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Holmes v. Hoemako Hospital 573 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
The trial court concluded that it had jurisdiction of the subject matter, , and Peterson v. Tucson General Hosp., Inc., 114 Ariz.App.
Pima County Medical Society v. Felland 565 P.2d 188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Pima County Medical Society v. Felland 565 P.2d 188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
In Arizona, , the court found that when a medical society controls a doctor’s access to hospital facilities, it exercises a quasi-governmental power which is the legitimate object of judicial concern.
Peterson v. Tucson General Hospital, Inc. 559 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Peterson v. Tucson General Hospital, Inc. 559 P.2d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
the court agreed with the reasoning in Falcone .
Arizona Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. Fridena 457 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Arizona Osteopathic Medical Ass'n v. Fridena 457 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
our Supreme Court held that a writ of mandamus is an appropriate remedial measure to restore a medical doctor to membership in the Maricopa County Medical Society, when membership in this society was a prerequisite to access to local hospital facilities.
Quimby v. School District No. 21 of Pinal County 455 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Quimby v. School District No. 21 of Pinal County 455 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Maricopa County Medical Society v. Blende 448 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1968
Maricopa County Medical Society v. Blende 448 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1968
Maricopa County Medical Society v. Blende 427 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Maricopa County Medical Society v. Blende 427 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
ruled in favor of Dr. Blende, and for the purposes of our consideration made the following pertinent statements and observations: “We have examined the Society’s articles Falcone decision.
Blende v. Stanford 403 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1965
Blende v. Stanford 403 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1965