Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Woods v. Industrial Commission, 368 P.2d 758.
- Vargas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 926 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Vargas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
926 P.2d 533
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See Woods v. Industrial Comm’n, , (prior loss of both legs); Edwards v. Industrial Comm’n, 3 Ariz.App.
- Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 598 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
598 P.2d 1019
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
but we find that that case is at most, ambiguous on the point raised in this case.
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
- Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Yount v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
Yount v. Industrial Commission
514 P.2d 280
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
overruled in part in Ronquillo, supra
- Rodgers v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 46 Ariz. 1973
- Rodgers v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 46 Ariz. 1973
- Rodgers v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 685 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
Rodgers v. Industrial Commission
488 P.2d 685
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Meador v. Industrial Commission, 2 Ariz.App.
- Hurley v. Industrial Commission 468 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Hurley v. Industrial Commission 468 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Lamb v. Industrial Commission 448 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Lamb v. Industrial Commission 448 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- Wollum v. Industrial Commission 414 P.2d 137 Ariz. 1966
- Corrier v. Industrial Commission 411 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
-
Corrier v. Industrial Commission
411 P.2d 462
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
ake into consideration a previous disability as it exists at the time of a subsequent injury, and if any disability results from the subsequent injury, whether scheduled or unscheduled, or both, the Commission must treat the disabilities as general or unscheduled in nature, and base its award on loss of earning capacity only, as derived from the facts of the case.” at 16 , at 759 (1962).
- Meador v. Industrial Commission 409 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
-
Meador v. Industrial Commission
409 P.2d 302
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
ake into consideration a previous disability as it exists at the time of a subsequent injury, and if any disability results from the subsequent injury, whether scheduled or unscheduled, or both, the Commission must treat the disabilities as general or unscheduled in nature, and base its award on loss of earning capacity only, as derived from the facts of the case.”
- Sproul v. Industrial Commission 370 P.2d 279 Ariz. 1962
- Sproul v. Industrial Commission 370 P.2d 279 Ariz. 1962