Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stearman v. Miranda, 396 P.2d 622.

34 citing documents.

Estate of Maudsley v. Meta Services, Inc. 258 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Estate of Maudsley v. Meta Services, Inc. 258 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(generally, proximate cause is to be decided by the factfinder).
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
Smith v. Chapman 564 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1977
Smith v. Chapman 564 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1977
Steed v. Cuevas 540 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Steed v. Cuevas 540 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Young Candy & Tobacco Company, supra.
Ong v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. 503 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Ong v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. 503 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
and Serrano v. Kenneth A. Ethridge Contracting Co., 2 Ariz.App.
Hlavaty v. Song 491 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
Hlavaty v. Song 491 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
Downey v. Lackey 466 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Downey v. Lackey 466 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Hersey v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 458 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hersey v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 458 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
McDowell v. Davis 448 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1968
McDowell v. Davis 442 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
McDowell v. Davis 448 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1968
Salt River Valley Water Users’ , ; , ; Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Conwell
McDowell v. Davis 442 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
and Serrano v. Kenneth A. Ethridge Contracting Co., 2 Ariz.App.
Worthington v. Funk 442 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Worthington v. Funk 442 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Myers v. Rollette 429 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Myers v. Rollette 429 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Smith v. Goodman 430 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Smith v. Goodman 430 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Harmon v. Szrama 429 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1967
Harmon v. Szrama 429 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1967
Brand v. JH Rose Trucking Company 427 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1967
Brand v. JH Rose Trucking Company 427 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1967
on material facts is conflicting, or where on disputed facts reasonable and fair-minded men may differ as to inferences and conclusions to be drawn, or where different conclusions might reasonably be reached by different minds, and thus the question of negligence and proximate cause is one of fact to be submitted to the jury and not a question of law for the court; * * * ’ ” , , -347 , .
Whitly v. Moore 427 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Whitly v. Moore 427 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Bullard v. Stonebraker 422 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1967
Bullard v. Stonebraker 422 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1967