Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rayburn v. State Ex Rel. Willey, 378 P.2d 496.

28 citing documents.

City of Phoenix v. John E. Garretson 322 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2014
City of Phoenix v. John E. Garretson 322 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2014
City of Phoenix v. Garretson 302 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
City of Phoenix v. Garretson 302 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Willey, , (explaining that the final clause of A.R.S.
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Arizona, Inc. 795 P.2d 221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Arizona, Inc. 795 P.2d 221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Dewey v. Arnold 764 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Dewey v. Arnold 764 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
urchaser having the power of condemnation are admissible in condemnation proceedings only if a proper foundation has been laid, that is, that “the sale was voluntary, that the owner was willing to sell but not compelled to do so, that the buyer was willing to buy but under no necessity of buying the property.”
State Ex Rel. Miller v. J.R. Norton Co. 760 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State Ex Rel. Miller v. J.R. Norton Co. 760 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Willey, , is directly on point.
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
Olson v. State 467 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Olson v. State 467 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Willey, , , City of Phoenix v. Wade, 5 Ariz.App.
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Schaffer 467 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1970
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Schaffer 467 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1970
Willey, , , we said: “While there can be no doubt from the evidence that the alteration in the traffic flow on Twenty-third Avenue and Buckeye Road as they abut the appellant’s property adversely affected her from a pecuniary standpoint, it is well established that not all elements of damage resulting from a high
Uvodich v. Arizona Board of Regents 453 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Uvodich v. Arizona Board of Regents 453 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Kansas City v. Berkshire Lumber Company, 393 S.W.2d 470 (Mo.1965); Wolf v. Commonwealth, 422 Pa.
State v. Wilson 438 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1968
State v. Wilson 438 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1968
Willey, , , this does not mean that if traffic is using the highway an abutting property owner may not profit from its flow.
City of Phoenix v. Wade 428 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
City of Phoenix v. Wade 428 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Wilson 420 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Wilson 420 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Mabe v. State, 86 Idaho 254 , ; People v. Ricciardi, 23 Cal.2d 390
Rutledge v. State 412 P.2d 467 Ariz. 1966
Rutledge v. State 412 P.2d 467 Ariz. 1966
Sanitary District No. 1 of Pima County v. State Ex Rel. Willey 399 P.2d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Sanitary District No. 1 of Pima County v. State Ex Rel. Willey 399 P.2d 179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965