Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Paulley v. Industrial Commission, 371 P.2d 888.

65 citing documents.

Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
Timothy Matthews v. ica/city of tucson/tristar Ariz. 2022
Comm’n, (“[W]e again announce that Arizona follows the English and now majority American view that an injury is caused ‘by accident’ when either the external cause or the resulting injury itself is unexpected or accidental.
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Comm’n, Sun Control Tile Co. v. Indus.
McCreary v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 835 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McCreary v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 835 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Paulley v. Industrial Comm’n
Lorentzen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 790 P.2d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Lorentzen v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 790 P.2d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 774 P.2d 221 Ariz. 1989
Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 774 P.2d 221 Ariz. 1989
Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, , (quoting Paulley v. Industrial Comm’n, , ).
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Mandex, Inc. v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 729 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Mandex, Inc. v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 729 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
An injury is caused by accident when either “the external cause or the resulting injury itself is unexpected or accidental.”
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation v. Industrial Commission 611 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation v. Industrial Commission 611 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial Commission 579 P.2d 555 Ariz. 1978
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial Commission 579 P.2d 555 Ariz. 1978
However, , we modified the strictness of this rule, saying: “* * * Arizona follows the English and now majority American view that an injury is caused ‘by accident’ when either the external cause or the resulting injury itself is unexpected or accidental.” Hence, by definition, an injury is cause
Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial Commission 571 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial Commission 571 P.2d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
which stated: “[A]n injury is caused ‘by accident’ when either the external cause or the resulting injury itself is unexpected or accidental.” 91 Ariz. at 272 , 371 P.2d at 893 .
Lamb v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 727 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Lamb v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 727 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Montgomery v. Industrial Commission, 7 Ariz.App.
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Schreven v. Industrial Commission, supra
Ayer v. Industrial Commission 531 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Ayer v. Industrial Commission 531 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Garcia v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Garcia v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
In this case the causal relationship between the disability and the alleged incident or incidents of work is a matter necessarily within the knowledge of medical experts and not,- as petitioner argues, a causation clearly apparent to any layman, cf. Paulley v. Industrial Commission, 91 * P.2d 888 (1962); , , , , Hurley v. Industrial Commission, 20 Ariz.App.
Hurley v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Hurley v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Theoharidi v. Industrial Commission, 8 Ariz.App.
Caganich v. Industrial Commission 503 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1972
Caganich v. Industrial Commission 503 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1972
“[A]n injury is caused ‘by accident’ when either the external cause or the resulting injury itself is unexpected or accidental.” Paulley v. Industrial Comm’n
Tronsen v. Industrial Commission 500 P.2d 1137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Tronsen v. Industrial Commission 500 P.2d 1137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 497 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 497 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
In our opinion, , support the finding of a compensable industrial injury by accident on 1 August 1970 even in the absence of any evidence of an event during work which at that moment produced pain.
Houser v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Houser v. Industrial Commission 489 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Brock v. Industrial Commission 486 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Brock v. Industrial Commission 486 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Flores v. Industrial Commission, 11 Ariz.App.
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial Commission 480 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial Commission 480 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
the claimant’s preexisting diabetes did not affect in any way the performance of his duties, but did affect his body’s ability to control infections.
Sell v. Industrial Commission 471 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Sell v. Industrial Commission 471 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Copper v. Industrial Commission 463 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Copper v. Industrial Commission 463 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Jones v. Industrial Commission 454 P.2d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969