7348
Precedential
Processed
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Aire-Flo Products, Inc.
Cited by
- Tanner Companies v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 743 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 659 P.2d 1299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- B. J. Cecil Trucking, Inc. v. Tiffany Construction Co. 597 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Heard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Company 496 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Cagle v. Home Insurance Co. 483 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Arizona Gunite Builders, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co. 459 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1969
- Costanzo v. Stewart 453 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- Dairyland Mutual Insurance Company v. Andersen 433 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1967
- D. M. A. F. B. Federal Credit Union v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance 396 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1964
- Dmafb Fed. Cr. U. v. Employers Mut. L. Ins. 396 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1964
- ROYAL INDEMNITY CO. OF NY v. Business Factors, Inc. 393 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1964
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Hirsch 385 P.2d 211
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Appellant insurance company was defendant in a suit to recover, on a con *331 tractor’s license bond issued pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-1152 (1956). The suit was against the prime contractor and the insurance company. Summary judgment was entered for the plaintiff, and the defendant insurance company appeals. Our decision in this case is controlled by United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Hirsch, Ariz., 385 P.2d 211 . Affirmed.