Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sax v. Kopelman, 396 P.2d 17.

56 citing documents.

Smith v. Delvin 728 P.2d 1231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc. 665 P.2d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc. 665 P.2d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
It is proper to instruct the jury that an issue that was pleaded and argued has been removed, , to prevent confusion of the jury.
Englehart v. Jeep Corp. 594 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1979
Englehart v. Jeep Corp. 594 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1979
we held: “It makes no sense to us to allow a defendant who has no evidence of contributory negligence to assert this defense in his answer, read the answer to the jury, argue the issue during the course of the trial and then leave the issue in limbo when the court instructs the jury.
Giovanelli v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 587 P.2d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Giovanelli v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 587 P.2d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc., 6 Ariz.App.
Kauffman v. Schroeder 568 P.2d 411 Ariz. 1977
Kauffman v. Schroeder 568 P.2d 411 Ariz. 1977
-97 , Brierley v. Anaconda Co., Ill Ariz. 8, 12
Jamas v. Krpan 568 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Jamas v. Krpan 568 P.2d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
General Electric Credit Corp. v. Tidwell Industries, Inc. 565 P.2d 868 Ariz. 1977
General Electric Credit Corp. v. Tidwell Industries, Inc. 565 P.2d 868 Ariz. 1977
Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc.
Poggi v. Kates 564 P.2d 380 Ariz. 1977
Poggi v. Kates 564 P.2d 380 Ariz. 1977
Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc., 6 Ariz.App.
McGriff v. McGriff 549 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
McGriff v. McGriff 549 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Citizens Utilities Co. v. Firemen’s Ins.
W. R. Skousen Contractor, Inc. v. Gray 546 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
W. R. Skousen Contractor, Inc. v. Gray 546 P.2d 369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Citizens Utilities Co. v. Firemen’s Ins.
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc. 542 P.2d 1102 Ariz. 1976
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc. 542 P.2d 1102 Ariz. 1976
Viewing the evidence on the issue of negligence in a light most favorable to the party who prevailed in the trial court, , we find no error generally in allowing the defendants to attempt to place the blame on Allison.
Raybond Electronics, Inc. v. Glen-Mar Door Manufacturing Co. 528 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Raybond Electronics, Inc. v. Glen-Mar Door Manufacturing Co. 528 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Nagle v. Conger, 10 Ariz.App.
Arizona Refrigeration Supplies, Inc. v. Brookshire 477 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Arizona Refrigeration Supplies, Inc. v. Brookshire 477 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Chavez v. Pima County 477 P.2d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Chavez v. Pima County 477 P.2d 763 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Zakroff v. May, 8 Ariz.App.
Sweet v. Ybarra 474 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Sweet v. Ybarra 474 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Prophet v. S. H. Kress Co. 470 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Prophet v. S. H. Kress Co. 470 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
butory negligence to be submitted to the jury and it would be error to allow the jury to consider that issue, (citations omitted) We hold, therefore, that where contributory negligence has been pleaded as a defense and where there is no evidence from which a reasonable man might infer that contributory negligence might exist the trial judge must withdraw the issue from the jury.”
E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. Noland 466 P.2d 740 Ariz. 1970
E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. Noland 466 P.2d 740 Ariz. 1970
Nagle v. Conger 456 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Nagle v. Conger 456 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Zimmer v. Salcido 453 P.2d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Zakroff v. May 443 P.2d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Zakroff v. May 443 P.2d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Lowery v. Universal Match Corporation 430 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Lowery v. Universal Match Corporation 430 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc. 429 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc. 429 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Whitly v. Moore 427 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Whitly v. Moore 427 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
the Supreme Court stated on page 396 of the Arizona Reports on page 18 of 396 P.2d that it is not appropriate to give an instruction on contributory negligence “ * * * where there is no evidence from which a reasonable man could find the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence.” *372 On the o
Bullard v. Stonebraker 422 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1967
Bullard v. Stonebraker 422 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1967
Verdugo v. Po Shing Gee 417 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Verdugo v. Po Shing Gee 417 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Lashinsky v. Hoffman 411 P.2d 467 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Lashinsky v. Hoffman 411 P.2d 467 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Snyder v. Beers, 1 Ariz.App.