Cited by

Little, 193 Ariz. at 520, ¶ 5 ().

This court accepts the family court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, ¶ 5 (1999) () (affirm unless “devoid of evidentiary support”), but reviews de novo the court’s conclusions of law and interpretation of the Arizona Child Support Guidelines (“Guidelines”), ¶ 7 (App. 2017).

An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to affirming the orders “is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

This court reviews the superior court’s legal decision-making and parenting time orders for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 13 (App. 2014), which occurs when the record, “viewed in the light most favorable” to affirming the orders, “is devoid of competent evidence to support the[m].” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

at 179; (“[T]he record must be devoid of competent evidence to support the decision of the trial court .

¶ 5 (App. 2019), which “occurs when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision,” ¶ 9 (App. 2019), or when “the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision,” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

(“It is the general rule that the exercise of a court’s discretion will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong.”) ().

To determine that there has been an abuse of discretion, “the record must be devoid of competent evidence to support the decision of the trial court.” ().

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits legal error, ¶ 7 (App. 2012), or "when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court's decision, is 'devoid of competent evidence to support' the decision," ¶ 5 (1999) ().

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits legal error, ¶ 7 (App. 2012), or "when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court's decision, is 'devoid of competent evidence to support' the decision," ¶ 5 (1999) ().

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

An abuse of discretion exists when the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support” the decision, or when the trial court makes an error of law in the process of making its decision, ¶ 7 (App. 2012); ¶ 3 (App. 2009).

An abuse of discretion occurs “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) ().

P. 52(a), and ¶ 3 (App. 1998)), and we will affirm the custody order if there is any reasonable evidence to support it, ().

(“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.”)

An abuse of discretion occurs when “the record [is] devoid of competent evidence to support the decision of the trial court.” ().

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (1999) () (internal quotes omitted).