Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite D. M. A. F. B. Federal Credit Union v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance, 396 P.2d 20.

75 citing documents.

Anderson v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Anderson v. State Farm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re the Marriage of McCulloch 546 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
In Re the Marriage of McCulloch 546 P.3d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Hv & Canal v. Upper Iowa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hv & Canal v. Upper Iowa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Madison v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
IB Property Holdings, LLC v. Rancho Del Mar Apartments Ltd. Partnership 263 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
IB Property Holdings, LLC v. Rancho Del Mar Apartments Ltd. Partnership 263 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. DGG & Car, Inc. 183 P.3d 513 Ariz. 2008
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. DGG & Car, Inc. 183 P.3d 513 Ariz. 2008
Co., see also Pawelczyk v. Allied Life Ins.
Gittings v. American Family Insurance 888 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Gittings v. American Family Insurance 888 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Busch Development, Inc. v. American Insurance 760 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Busch Development, Inc. v. American Insurance 760 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Co. of Wis., at 402, 403 , at 23 (1964).
Matter of Estate of Alarcon 718 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Matter of Estate of Alarcon 718 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Tolifson v. Globe American Casualty Co. 672 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Tolifson v. Globe American Casualty Co. 672 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Charbonneau v. Blue Cross of Washington & Alaska 634 P.2d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Charbonneau v. Blue Cross of Washington & Alaska 634 P.2d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Federal Credit Union v. Em *163 ployers Mutual Liability Insurance Co., , and the policy must be read as a whole, so as to give a reasonable and harmonious effect to all of its provisions.
Thompson v. Government Employees Insurance 592 P.2d 1284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Thompson v. Government Employees Insurance 592 P.2d 1284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Harbor Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 559 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Harbor Insurance v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 559 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Stephan v. Allstate Insurance Company 548 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Stephan v. Allstate Insurance Company 548 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc. 547 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1976
Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc. 547 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1976
Co. of Wis., at 402, 403, at 23 (1964).
Basso v. Allstate Insurance Co. 504 P.2d 1281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Basso v. Allstate Insurance Co. 504 P.2d 1281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company 494 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company 494 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Navaho Freight Lines, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Price v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY 494 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Heard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Company 496 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Heard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Company 496 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
as follows: “In the absence of a statutory provision which will be read into each policy issued thereunder and cannot be contracted away by either party, , the principles to be applied in construing an insura
Balboa Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 496 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance Company, 16 Ariz.App.
Pesqueria v. Factory Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of America 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Pesqueria v. FACTORY MUT. LIAB. INS. CO. OF AMER. 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Pesqueria v. FACTORY MUT. LIAB. INS. CO. OF AMER. 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
: "The cardinal principle pertaining to the construction and interpretation of insurance contracts is that the intention of the parties should control.
Pesqueria v. Factory Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of America 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
: “The cardinal principle pertaining to the construction and interpretation of insurance contracts is that the intention of the parties should control.
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Scott 491 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1971
Co. of Wis., , we said: “In construing an insurance contract, where there is any ambiguity, or more than one possible construction of the provisions thereof, it is to be construed most strongly against the insurer and in favor of the insured.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co. 490 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Transport Indemnity Co. 490 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Home Indemnity Company v. Wilson 489 P.2d 244 Ariz. 1971
Home Indemnity Company v. Wilson 489 P.2d 244 Ariz. 1971
we said: “[T]he principles to be applied in construing an insurance policy have been stated by this Court in a series of decisions and may be summarized as follows : The cardinal principle pertaining to the construction and interpretation of insurance contracts is that the intention of the partie
Cagle v. Home Insurance Co. 483 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971