Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite King v. Uhlmann, 437 P.2d 928.

56 citing documents.

Tempe Woman's v. Loren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Tempe Woman's v. Loren Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V. Ariz. 2023
Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V. Ariz. 2023
Kimball v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kimball v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Memi relies on authority that a constructive trust declares “the rights and interests at the time of the questioned transaction, and it reverts back to the time of the transaction which gave rise to the constructive trust.” Pioneer Annuity, 159 Ariz. at 154.
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. Sourant 272 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
cision that must be based on clear and convincing evidence will be affirmed “‘unless we must say as a matter of law that no one could reasonably find the evidence to be clear and convincing.’” Murillo, 79 Ariz. at 9, 281 P.2d at 791, (same); (same); (court reviewing claim of insufficient evidence in criminal case must ask if reasonable factfinder could have found evidence sufficient to prove defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt), citing Jackson v. Virgini
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Greene 985 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Greene 985 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
“That an in personam judgment may not be rendered against one who has never been a party to the litigation would seem so obvious that citation of authority should be unnecessary.” , (Struekmeyer, J., dissenting).
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Hunnicutt Construction, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson Trust No. 3496 928 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Oyakawa v. Gillett 854 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Oyakawa v. Gillett 854 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
The court relied on Justice Struck-meyer’s , to void the judgment against the wife and the community.
Flexmaster Aluminum Awning Co., Inc. v. Hirschberg 839 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Flexmaster Aluminum Awning Co., Inc. v. Hirschberg 839 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
The court relied on Justice Struckmeyer’s , to void the judgment against the wife and the community.
Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. National Equity Life Insurance 765 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. National Equity Life Insurance 765 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Garn v. Garn 745 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Garn v. Garn 745 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
§ 33-452 is “to prevent a husband from conveying or encumbering community property unless it was executed and acknowledged by the wife, the object of which is apparent—to prevent the husband from defrauding the wife.”
Yano v. Yano 697 P.2d 1132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Yano v. Yano 697 P.2d 1132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
P.2d 786 (1955); Brown v. Karas, [ , ]; P.2d 928 (1968) [Footnote omitted].
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130 647 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130 647 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Brown v. Karas [ , ], supra
Hellyer v. Hellyer 632 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Hellyer v. Hellyer 632 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Chirekos v. Chirekos, 24 Ariz.App.
Stoltz v. Maloney 630 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Stoltz v. Maloney 630 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Harmon v. Harmon 613 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Harmon v. Harmon 613 P.2d 1298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Eng v. Stein 599 P.2d 796 Ariz. 1979
Eng v. Stein 599 P.2d 796 Ariz. 1979
“That an in personam judgment may not be rendered against one who has never been a party to the litigation would seem so obvious that citation of authority should be unnecessary.” , (Struckmeyer, J., dissenting).
Bender v. Bender 597 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Bender v. Bender 597 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Arizona Central Credit Union v. Holden, 6 Ariz.App.
Hopper v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Hopper v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Brown v. Karas, supra ; , 1 Even where the more stringent “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is imposed as a guide for the trier of fact, questions concerning the credibility of the witnesses and the weight and value to be given to the testimony are considered as questions exclusively for the jury, State v. Pieck, 111 A
Tucson Estate Residents Ass'n v. Mobilife Corp. 546 P.2d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Tucson Estate Residents Ass'n v. Mobilife Corp. 546 P.2d 352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Markel v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.
Chirekos v. Chirekos 537 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Chirekos v. Chirekos 537 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
L. M. White Contracting Co., supra.
United Security Corp. v. Anderson Aviation Sales Co. 532 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
United Security Corp. v. Anderson Aviation Sales Co. 532 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
O’ , ; , , Reynolds v. United Producers & Consumers Co-op, 17 Ariz.App.
Nitrini v. Feinbaum 501 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Nitrini v. Feinbaum 501 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
540 , ; , and appellate courts will not interfere with the trial court’s determination as to the sufficiency of the evidence unless it • can be said, as a matter of law, that no one could reasonably find the evidence to be clear and convincing.
Packer v. Donaldson 492 P.2d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Packer v. Donaldson 492 P.2d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972