Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pettis v. Industrial Commission, 372 P.2d 72.

54 citing documents.

Cantrell v. kroger/kroger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Cantrell v. kroger/kroger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Coburn v. Larry H miller/wcf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Coburn v. Larry H miller/wcf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Comm’n, (holding that inclusion in base wage of two months during which employee was prevented from working by employer shutdown was improper).
westat/liberty v. Free Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
westat/liberty v. Free Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wozniak v. Industrial Commission 359 P.3d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Wozniak v. Industrial Commission 359 P.3d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Comm’n, see also Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014) (defining “seasonal employment” as “an occupation possible only during limited parts of the year, such as a summer-camp counselor, a baseball-park vendor, or a shopping mall Santa” and “seasonal employee” as “an employee who is engaged to work for only a cer
Southwest Restaurant Systems v. Industrial Commission 825 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Southwest Restaurant Systems v. Industrial Commission 825 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Pettis v. Industrial Comm’n
Pinetop Truck & Equipment Supply v. Industrial Commission 776 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Pinetop Truck & Equipment Supply v. Industrial Commission 776 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See Pettis v. Industrial Comm’n
Oak Indus. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 739 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Oak Indus. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 739 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See, e.g., Pettis v. Industrial Comm’n, , Moorehead v. Industrial Comm’n, 17 Ariz.App.
County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 699 P.2d 389 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Pena v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 683 P.2d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Pena v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 683 P.2d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Elco Veterinary Supply v. Industrial Commission 668 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Elco Veterinary Supply v. Industrial Commission 668 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Davis v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 655 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Davis v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 655 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
These justifications include, but are not limited to, intermittent employment, see United Metro v. Industrial Commission, supra; seasonal employment, , or inflated wages received during the month before the injury
Rogers v. Cedar Van Lines, Inc. 281 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1979
Baker v. Industrial Commission 579 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Baker v. Industrial Commission 579 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Stanton v. Industrial Commission 567 P.2d 317 Ariz. 1977
Stanton v. Industrial Commission 567 P.2d 317 Ariz. 1977
Seasonal employment is in “occupations which can be carried on only at certain seasons or fairly definite portions of the year” and “does not include such occupations as may be carried on throughout the entire year.”
Stanton v. Industrial Commission 567 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Stanton v. Industrial Commission 567 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
we said: [sjeasonal employment refers to occupations which can be carried on only at certain seasons or fairly definite portions of the year.
Miller v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1976
Miller v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1976
we said: “[s]easonal employment refers to occupations which can be carried on only at certain seasons or fairly definite portions of the year.
Hobbs v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hobbs v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
the claimant was a timber cutter who was employed by an independent timber contractor.
Dominquez v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Dominquez v. Industrial Commission 529 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
a timber cutter protested an award which had been computed over a 12 month period when he had worked only 10 months due to a shutdown by his employer.
Moorehead v. Industrial Commission 495 P.2d 866 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Moorehead v. Industrial Commission 495 P.2d 866 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
On the ap *99 , the petitioning workman contended that the Commission should not have deducted “saw rental” before computing his average monthly-wage.
Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Zapien v. Industrial Commission 470 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Zapien v. Industrial Commission 470 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Vinyard v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Vinyard v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
(citations omitted) Accordingly, the Commission should have excluded the two months during which petitioner received no wages due to a shutdown by his employer in computing his average monthly wage.” 303
Powell v. Industrial Commission 451 P.2d 37 Ariz. 1969
Powell v. Industrial Commission 451 P.2d 37 Ariz. 1969
Kennecott Copper, , ; , .
Powell v. Industrial Commission 441 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Powell v. Industrial Commission 441 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Mickelson v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Mickelson v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
* * * ” , the petitioner sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment as a timber cutter.
Waller v. Industrial Commission 406 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1965
Waller v. Industrial Commission 406 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1965