Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sturm v. Heim, 389 P.2d 702.

34 citing documents.

Velazquez v. Fmz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Velazquez v. Fmz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See, (In a land sale contract, the seller delivered possession of land to the buyer, but the title remained, and was quieted in favor of, the seller.).
Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Trevillian v. Lee 527 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1974
Trevillian v. Lee 527 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1974
“Where time is of the essence of the contract, a default in payments entitles the sellers to treat the contract as at an end.”
Lancaster v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation 511 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Lancaster v. Chemi-Cote Perlite Corporation 511 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Brand v. Dolgin 496 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Brand v. Dolgin 496 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
§ 33-741 run from the date of’default and not from the date of notice of' termination, , and therefore compliance with the statute is not determined".
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
Arizona Public Service Company v. Brittain 486 P.2d 176 Ariz. 1971
Williams v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 476 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Williams v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 476 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Baker v. Walston & *351 Company, Inc., 7 Ariz.App.
Wineglass Ranches, Inc. v. Campbell 473 P.2d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Wineglass Ranches, Inc. v. Campbell 473 P.2d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
[1964].” Wineglass does not contend that a court adjudication was prerequisite to a valid forfeiture of Cerene Properties’ interest, or that a declaration of forfeiture by the Campbells could not be effective.
Avechuco v. Awtrey 470 P.2d 451 Ariz. 1970
Avechuco v. Awtrey 470 P.2d 451 Ariz. 1970
Spray-Chemical Corp., , ; Robledo v. Kopp, supra; , ; , ; , ; In Re Stitt’s Estate, , ; , ; Nieman v. Jacobs, supra; Casey v. Beaudry Motor Co., supra; , .
Myers v. Rollette 439 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1968
Myers v. Rollette 439 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1968
The evidence taken in the strongest light in favor of the defendant, against whom the court ruled, Heth v. Del Webb’s Highway Inn, , , was that although plaintiff and defendant originally agreed that each would contribute a certain amount of cash and would work the deposit as partners, the original agreement was modified.
Reeves v. ARIZONA AGGREGATE ASS'N HEALTH & WELF. F. 435 P.2d 829 Ariz. 1967
Reeves v. ARIZONA AGGREGATE ASS'N HEALTH & WELF. F. 435 P.2d 829 Ariz. 1967
After construing the evidence most favorably for defendant, , , it is our considered opinion that reasonable minds could differ on the inferences to be drawn therefrom.
OS Stapley Company v. Miller 430 P.2d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
OS Stapley Company v. Miller 430 P.2d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
.” Heth v. Del Webb’s Highway Inn, , , filed 22 June 1967.
Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and Company 431 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and Company 431 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Also: “ * * * whatever competent evidence appellants have introduced, including all inferences that can reasonably be drawn therefrom, is assumed to be true, and, if the evidence is of such character that reasonable minds may differ on the inferences to be drawn therefrom, the case must be submitted to the jury.”
Heth v. Del Webb's Highway Inn 429 P.2d 442 Ariz. 1967
Heth v. Del Webb's Highway Inn 429 P.2d 442 Ariz. 1967
Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co. 420 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co. 420 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Farmers Investment Co. v. Galloska 420 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Farmers Investment Co. v. Galloska 420 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Hinson v. Phoenix Pie Company 416 P.2d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Hinson v. Phoenix Pie Company 416 P.2d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Clark v. Compania Ganadera de Cananea, S.A.