Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Porter v. Porter, 416 P.2d 564.

48 citing documents.

Busby v. Hon goldstein/busby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Busby v. Hon goldstein/busby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(“The court has jurisdiction to determine the rights of the nonresident spouse in the attached property.”); Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 59 (1971) (“A state has power to exercise judicial jurisdiction to affect interests in land in the state although a person owning or claiming these interest
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream 8 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream 8 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Giehrl v. Royal Aloha Vacation Club, Inc. 937 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Giehrl v. Royal Aloha Vacation Club, Inc. 937 P.2d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Giehrl argues that under the “rule of primacy” the rendering court’s determination of its own jurisdiction controls
In re 1988 Chevrolet ½ PU, VIN 924 P.2d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
In re 1988 Chevrolet ½ PU, VIN 924 P.2d 109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Cochise County v. Kirschner 830 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Cochise County v. Kirschner 830 P.2d 470 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
McCready v. McCready 810 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
McCready v. McCready 810 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
“[Pjarties cannot, by consent, give a court jurisdiction of a subject matter of which it would not otherwise have jurisdiction____” , cert.
Solomon v. Findley 796 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Solomon v. Findley 796 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Maricopa Partnerships, Inc. v. Petyak 790 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Maricopa Partnerships, Inc. v. Petyak 790 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Matter of Estate of Alarcon 718 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Matter of Estate of Alarcon 718 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Carroll v. Lee 712 P.2d 923 Ariz. 1986
Carroll v. Lee 712 P.2d 923 Ariz. 1986
Cannon v. Dunn 700 P.2d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Cannon v. Dunn 700 P.2d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Leon v. Numkena 689 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Leon v. Numkena 689 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Parks v. Rawson 657 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Parks v. Rawson 657 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Rule 60(d), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.
Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 621 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1980
Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 621 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1980
Webb v. Charles 611 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Webb v. Charles 611 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Kelly v. Kelly, 24 Ariz.App.
Neely v. Neely 563 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Neely v. Neely 563 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Porter v. Commercial Standard Insurance 543 P.2d 1120 Ariz. 1975
Porter v. Commercial Standard Insurance 543 P.2d 1120 Ariz. 1975
Kelly v. Kelly 540 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Kelly v. Kelly 540 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Rodieck v. Rodieck, 9 Ariz.App.
Tarnoff v. Jones 497 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Tarnoff v. Jones 497 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
In the Matter of Wilson 470 P.2d 441 Ariz. 1970
In the Matter of Wilson 470 P.2d 441 Ariz. 1970
363 , , vacated, , ; , ; , , cert.
Day v. Wiswall 464 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Day v. Wiswall 464 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
To support their contention that full faith and credit cannot be given to the decree in this case, the appellees cite Restatement of Conflict of Laws § 449
Rodieck v. Rodieck 450 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Rodieck v. Rodieck 450 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969