Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Smith v. Tang, 412 P.2d 697.

43 citing documents.

Wallace v. Irving Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Wallace v. Irving Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(“Where a verdict is manifestly irregular or defective the trial court may put the verdict in such form as to conform to the intention of the jury, when the intention can be ascertained with certainty.”).
Sesma v. Marquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sesma v. Marquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ortiz v. Diejuez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ortiz v. Diejuez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Kaufmann v. M & S Unlimited, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Kaufmann v. M & S Unlimited, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
The vendor remains the owner of the legal estate, while the vendee holds an equitable interest in the property.”); (“The mutual interest the joint tenants retain after a contract to sell is legal title .
Stapley v. American Bathtub Liners, Inc. 785 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Stapley v. American Bathtub Liners, Inc. 785 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In Re the Estate of Calligaro v. Owen 768 P.2d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
In Re the Estate of Calligaro v. Owen 768 P.2d 660 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
our supreme court held that proceeds from the sale of real property held in joint tenancy are subject to survivorship only if the contract of sale manifests an intent by the sellers to take the proceeds as joint tenants.
Lonergan v. Strom 700 P.2d 893 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Lonergan v. Strom 700 P.2d 893 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Rustin v. Cook 694 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Rustin v. Cook 694 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
the appellant argues that a remittitur should have been ordered reducing the damage awards to the amounts in the prayer.
Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ferree v. City of Yuma 603 P.2d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Ferree v. City of Yuma 603 P.2d 117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
In Re Estate of Estelle 593 P.2d 663 Ariz. 1979
In Re Estate of Estelle 593 P.2d 663 Ariz. 1979
International Harvester Co. v. Chiarello 555 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
International Harvester Co. v. Chiarello 555 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Spector v. Spector 531 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Spector v. Spector 531 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
King v. O'Rielly Motor Company 494 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
King v. O'Rielly Motor Company 494 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
See Santanello v. Cooper, supra
Western Surety Co. v. Walton 482 P.2d 910 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Western Surety Co. v. Walton 482 P.2d 910 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Hague 459 P.2d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Hague 459 P.2d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Reliance is placed on four recent Arizona cases: , Rogers v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., , , and Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Arizona Public Service Co, 8 Ariz.App.
School Dist. No. 69 of Maricopa County v. Altherr 458 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
School Dist. No. 69 of Maricopa County v. Altherr 458 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Cuna Mutual Insurance Society v. Dominguez 450 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Cuna Mutual Insurance Society v. Dominguez 450 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Dolph v. Cortez 446 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Dolph v. Cortez 446 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
King v. Uhlmann 437 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1968
Montalvo v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company 427 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Montalvo v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company 427 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Rogers v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., supra
Cagle v. Carr 413 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Cagle v. Carr 413 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966