Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sanchez v. Industrial Commission, 391 P.2d 579.

28 citing documents.

Reavis v. Industrial Commission 995 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Reavis v. Industrial Commission 995 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-24 , in which it found that concurrent uncovered employment excluded from average monthly wage must be excluded from post-injury earning capacity.
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
The ALJ and the court of appeals relied on our construction of this statutory provision in Wesolowski v. Industrial Comm’n, , and Sanchez v. Industrial Comm’n, , to determine Wiley’s average monthly wage.
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
and Arizona Public Service Co., supra, rejected the practice of comparing the post injury wage with the average monthly wage where one contains extraneous factors not common to the other.
Fletcher v. Industrial Commission 587 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Fletcher v. Industrial Commission 587 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Marum v. Industrial Comm’n, , , Wells v. Industrial Comm’n, , overruled on other grounds, Sanchez v. Industrial Comm’n, , Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial Comm’n
Wheeler v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 528 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Wheeler v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 528 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
where it was held that wages from separate jobs could not be aggregated when received from dissimilar trades or employments.
Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 492 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 492 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
wherein the court held that when part-time employment as a musician was not considered in establishing the injured workman’s average monthly wage, 2 then such part-time employment subsequent to the injury could not be considered in addition to his post-injury full-time employment in establishing
Basinger v. Industrial Commission 486 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Basinger v. Industrial Commission 486 P.2d 802 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Ranger Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission 485 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Ranger Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission 485 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Williams v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Williams v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Mickelson v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Overruled Mickelson v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
t is our view that the statute does not contemplate that any employer for whom an employee is working on a part-time basis should be compelled to assume a burden of compensation greater than the amount chargeable if the employee were working for him ■on a full-time basis.” (As will be pointed out later, , .)
Nebel v. Industrial Commission 412 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Nebel v. Industrial Commission 412 P.2d 740 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
the medical testimony could not establish whether petitioner’s alleged mental condition was unconsciously or consciously motivated.
Smith v. Martin Marietta Corporation 406 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Smith v. Martin Marietta Corporation 406 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Wesolowski v. Industrial Commission 405 P.2d 887 Ariz. 1965
Wesolowski v. Industrial Commission 405 P.2d 887 Ariz. 1965

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by