Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Nichols v. Baker, 416 P.2d 584.

66 citing documents.

City of Tucson v. Wondergem 466 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1970
City of Tucson v. Wondergem 466 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1970
Wade v. Seguin 462 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Wade v. Seguin 462 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
[Nichols vs. Baker, , ].” (Emphasis added.)
Arnold v. Frigid Food Express Co. 453 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Arnold v. Frigid Food Express Co. 453 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
: “A person is wantonly negligent if he wilfully does an act or fails to do an act which it is his duty to do, knowing or having reason to know of facts which would lead a reasonable man to realize that the act
Hibbitts v. Walter Jacoby & Sons 453 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hibbitts v. Walter Jacoby & Sons 453 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Wells v. Tanner Brothers Contracting Company 439 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1968
Wells v. Tanner Brothers Contracting Company 439 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1968
Davis v. Waters 436 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1968
Davis v. Waters 436 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1968
Newman v. Piazza 433 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Newman v. Piazza 433 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
our Supreme Court indicated that a wanton negligence instruction should be given if there is any substantial evidence to support the instruction, though such evidence must be more than “ * * * slight and inconclusive * * *.” 101 Ariz. at 153 , .
Evans v. Pickett 430 P.2d 413 Ariz. 1967
Evans v. Pickett 430 P.2d 413 Ariz. 1967
* * * ” at 153 , at 586 .