Andro v. Andro
Cited by
Followed in 1
- State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne 306 P.3d 17 Ariz. 2013
- State v. Peterson 267 P.3d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
- State v. Jessen 657 P.2d 871 Ariz. 1982
- Marce v. Bailey 636 P.2d 1225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- State v. Calhoun 563 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Dykes 562 P.2d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Knaubert 550 P.2d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Finn 528 P.2d 615 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Kevil 527 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Shing 509 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Jefferson 503 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1972
Opinion text
UDALL, Justice. In the decision in this case (97 Ar'iz. 302, 400 P.2d 10S) we reversed the lower court judgment modifying the original divorce decree. In the lower court judgment there was a provision for attorney’s fees to be paid the appellee (mother) by the appellant (father). Although our opinion stated that the judgment of the lower court was reversed, we did not specifically mention the matter concerning that part of the lower court-judgment providing for attorney’s fees. ' We' stated that the record would -at .most justify only a modification of the .original decree to provide for reasonable visitation rights to the appellee. Since some question has been raised on this matter, on a motion for a rehearing we emphasize that our reversal of the judgment below went to the entire judgment which includes a reversal of the award of attorney’s fees. See Annot., 2 A.L.R.2d 307 (1948).,. . 1 Appellee’s motion for a rehearing is denied. LOCKWOOD, C. J., STRUCKMEYER, V. C. J., and BERNSTEIN and McFARLAND, JJ., concurring.