Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tatman v. Provincial Homes, 382 P.2d 573.

98 citing documents.

pds/zurich v. Silberschlag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
pds/zurich v. Silberschlag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-69 (1963) (citation omitted); Montgomery Ward Co., Inc. v. Indus.
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 1350 Ariz. 1994
Thus, the evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that the baker’s lung was “the straw that broke the camel’s back.”
Barnes v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Barnes v. Industrial Commission 750 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
728 , , for the proposition that an employer takes an employee as he finds him.
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 692 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 692 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See MorrisonKnudson Company, , , , Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin v. Industrial Commission, 17 Ariz.App.
Lazarin v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 661 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Lazarin v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 661 P.2d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission, 25 Ariz.App.
Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 655 P.2d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Makinson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 655 P.2d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Petitioner’s predisposition toward his mental condition also would not defeat his claim; the employer “takes his employees as he finds them”, , in mental as well as physical condition.
Professional Furniture Service v. Industrial Commission 650 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Professional Furniture Service v. Industrial Commission 650 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Hooper v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 617 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hooper v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 617 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
See: , (“psychological disablement,” “disabling mental disorder”); Fireman’s , (“disabling nervous condition”); Bilbrey v. Industrial Commission, supra (“mental disability”).
Allen v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 602 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Allen v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 602 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Stange Co. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ. 585 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Stange Co. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZ. 585 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
They argue that if the July 29, 1975 incident hastened the need for surgery or aggravated the disc problem, then it was the legal cause of the subsequent surgery and Affiliated FM is the responsible carrier
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1978
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1978
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co., , , ” Morrison-Knudsen Co.
Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 574 P.2d 1311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 574 P.2d 1311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Murray v. Industrial Comm’n
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State Compensation Fund v. Keefe, 22 Ariz.App.
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial Commission 566 P.2d 293 Ariz. 1977
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial Commission 566 P.2d 293 Ariz. 1977
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Ramonett v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ramonett v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Petitioner’s predisposition toward his mental condition also would not defeat his claim; the employer “takes his employees as he finds them”, , in mental as well as physical condition.
Capitol Foundry v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Capitol Foundry v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Stringer v. Industrial Commission, supra; Selvidge v. American Airlines, Inc., 4 Ariz.App.
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Harbor Insurance Company v. The Industrial Commission of Arizona, 19 Ariz.App.
Arellano v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Distinguished Arellano v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Tatman v. Provincial Homes, 94 * P.2d 573 (1963).”
State Compensation Fund v. Keefe 526 P.2d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State Compensation Fund v. Keefe 526 P.2d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 509 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 509 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Montgomery Ward Co. v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App.
Homack v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 539 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Homack v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 539 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Mengel v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Mengel v. Industrial Commission 504 P.2d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Mead v. American Smelting & Refining Co., , ; Montgomery Ward Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App.
Caganich v. Industrial Commission 503 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1972
Caganich v. Industrial Commission 503 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1972
quoting from Murray v. Industrial Comm’n, , : “The difference in the medical and legal concept of cause results from the obvious differences in the basic problems and exigencies of the two professions in relation to causation.