Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sandoval v. Chenoweth, 428 P.2d 98.

102 citing documents.

Arceneaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 550 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1976
Arceneaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 550 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1976
we said that the second sentence of ARS § 28-1170(G) is ineffectual to limit coverage to the minimum amount required.
Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Duran 548 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Duran 548 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Arceneaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 546 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Arceneaux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 546 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
With respect to a policy which grants the excess or additional coverage the term ‘motor vehicle liability policy’ shall apply only to that part of the coverage which is required by this section.” , the insured, Sandoval, was involved in an automobile accident.
Dairyland Insurance Company v. Lopez 526 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Dairyland Insurance Company v. Lopez 526 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
and no violation of the policy shall defeat or void the policy.” , the Court held that the foregoing statutory provision of the Financial Responsibility Act controlled, and a policy provision which defeated liability if the insured failed to notify his insurer of the filing of a lawsuit was void.
Burdick v. University of Arizona 493 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Burdick v. University of Arizona 493 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Smith v. Monroe 488 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Smith v. Monroe 488 P.2d 1003 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Johnson v. Franco 487 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Johnson v. Franco 487 P.2d 406 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance 485 P.2d 552 Ariz. 1971
Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance 485 P.2d 552 Ariz. 1971
Allstate contends, in support of this position, , we held that an owner’s policy must provide to the full limits of the policy the same liability coverage to an omnibus insured as to the named insured himself.
Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance 477 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance 477 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
With respect to a policy which grants the excess or additional coverage the term ‘motor vehicle liability policy’ shall apply only to that part of the coverage which is required by this section.” , held that an owners’ policy must provide to the full limits of the policy the same liability coverage to an omnibus insured as to the named insured himself.
Chenoweth v. FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY 476 P.2d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Chenoweth v. FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY 476 P.2d 519 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 475 P.2d 253 Ariz. 1970
Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 475 P.2d 253 Ariz. 1970
The appellee places great emphasis on the public policy relating to liability insurance as enumerated by decision of this court, , ; , , , , in support .of his position that such policy is to provide as much insurance protection as possible, and cites Geyer v. Reserve Insurance Company, 8 Ariz.App.
Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 467 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 467 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
at 467 , 447 P.2d at 559
Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 461 P.2d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Transportation Insurance Company v. Wade 461 P.2d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Campbell v. FRAZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 459 P.2d 300 Ariz. 1969
Campbell v. FRAZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 459 P.2d 300 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
we held that “an omnibus clause is a part of every motor vehicle liability policy, by whatever name it may be called.” , , in discussing the failure of the insured to notify the insurer of the *558 filing of a suit against the insured as required by its policy, we stated: “In Schecter v. Killingsworth, supra [ , ], we further stated that the primary purpose of the Financial Responsibility Act was
Caballero v. Farmers Insurance Group 455 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Caballero v. Farmers Insurance Group 455 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
To support this contention, , , Geyer v. Reserve Insurance Company, 8 Ariz.App.
American National Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. McNally 451 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1969
American National Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. McNally 451 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1969
National Union Insurance v. Chatterton 448 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
National Union Insurance v. Chatterton 448 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Geyer v. Reserve Insurance Company 447 P.2d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Geyer v. Reserve Insurance Company 447 P.2d 556 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Appellant relies upon decisions construing a similar statute from the State of *466 Florida, and the public policy of Arizona
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. v. Clayton 440 P.2d 916 Ariz. 1968
Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. v. Clayton 440 P.2d 916 Ariz. 1968
Canal Insurance v. State Farm Insurance Companies 436 P.2d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Canal Insurance v. State Farm Insurance Companies 436 P.2d 494 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
The appellant’s argument that the driver limitation endorsement contained in the Canal policy, denying coverage when the insured automobile is driven by anyone other than the owner, is also answered against it in Dairyland Mutual Insurance Company v. Andersen, supra
Purcell v. Frazer 435 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Purcell v. Frazer 435 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Dairyland Mutual Insurance Company v. Andersen 433 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1967
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Dairyland Mutual Insurance 433 P.2d 966 Ariz. 1967
UNIVERSAL UNDER. INS. CO. v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co. 433 P.2d 966 Ariz. 1967
UNIVERSAL UNDER. INS. CO. v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co. 433 P.2d 966 Ariz. 1967
Dairyland Mutual Insurance Company v. Andersen 433 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1967
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Dairyland Mutual Insurance 433 P.2d 966 Ariz. 1967