Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Hordyk v. Farley, 382 P.2d 668.
- Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-
Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras
556 P.3d 291
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
(holding that where trial court proceeded after party filed “affidavit of bias,” issue “is jurisdictional in nature” such that writ of prohibition may issue).
- Brush Wellman, Inc. v. Lee 996 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
-
Brush Wellman, Inc. v. Lee
996 P.2d 1248
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
-92 , , 239 P. 506, 509 (1925); see also ¶ 500, Rev. Stat. Ariz. (1913).
- Taliaferro v. Taliaferro 921 P.2d 21 Ariz. 1996
- Taliaferro v. Taliaferro 921 P.2d 21 Ariz. 1996
- Huck v. Haralambie 593 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1979
- Huck v. Haralambie 593 P.2d 286 Ariz. 1979
- Evans v. Evans 574 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Evans v. Evans 574 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Cochise County v. Helm 635 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
Cochise County v. Helm
635 P.2d 855
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Miles v. Wright, 22 Ariz. *264 73 , 194 P. 88 (1920)
- East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry 500 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- East Camelback Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Foundation for Neurology & Psychiatry 500 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Consolidated Carpet Corp. v. Superior Court 477 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Consolidated Carpet Corp. v. Superior Court 477 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Itasca State Bank v. Superior Court 445 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- Itasca State Bank v. Superior Court 445 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- Edwards v. Superior Court 424 P.2d 859 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Edwards v. Superior Court
424 P.2d 859
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
The plunge into the pool of litigation with an affidavit disqualifying the trial judge must be made on a belief of prejudice theretofore entertained, and not on any subsequent discovery of such belief of prejudice resulting from an adverse ruling.” We are familiar with the Arizona cases of Pintek v. Superior Court, etc., , , and State v. Neil, 4 Ariz.App.
- State v. Neil 419 P.2d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- State v. Neil 419 P.2d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- State v. Miranda 416 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- State v. Miranda 416 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- Itule v. Farley 383 P.2d 127 Ariz. 1963
-
Itule v. Farley
383 P.2d 127
Ariz. 1963
1 , we synthesized the law in this state with regard to a litigant being given a change of judge, we find it unnecessary to develop the subject here.