Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Elerick v. Rocklin, 425 P.2d 103.
- Otis Elevator Company v. Valley National Bank 447 P.2d 879 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- State v. Crawford 441 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- State v. Crawford 441 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
- Ainsa v. Salt River Valley Water Users Ass'n 432 P.2d 149 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Ainsa v. Salt River Valley Water Users Ass'n
432 P.2d 149
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In our Supreme Court’s latest ruling on this point, , it is stated: “ ‘The moving party for a summary judgment has the burden to “ * * * show that there is no genuine issue as to any~material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Rule 56(c) Rules of Civil Procedure.
- Birchfield v. Thiercof 428 P.2d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- Birchfield v. Thiercof 428 P.2d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- Bass Investment Co. v. Banner Realty, Inc. 428 P.2d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
- Bass Investment Co. v. Banner Realty, Inc. 428 P.2d 142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
- Phoenix Jewish Community Council v. Leon 427 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1967
-
Phoenix Jewish Community Council v. Leon
427 P.2d 138
Ariz. 1967
The memorandum raises the inference that Mrs. Leon entered the property in 1936 as a tenant, and not adversely to the true owner.