Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dobson v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 421 P.2d 520.

36 citing documents.

HEAD v. MESA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
HEAD v. MESA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See Dobson v. Grand Int’l Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng’rs, (affirming summary judgment when the record contained no evidence supporting the plaintiff’s statements and does not raise a genuine issue of material fact).
Tamsen v. Weber 802 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Tamsen v. Weber 802 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Dobson v. Grand Int’l Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng’rs
Nelson v. Nelson 791 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nelson v. Nelson 791 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Dobson v. Grand Intemat’l Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Kroeger, 112 Ariz. at 286 , 541 P.2d at 386
Stuart v. Insurance Co. of North America 730 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Stuart v. Insurance Co. of North America 730 P.2d 255 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Matter of Estate of Kerr 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Valley National Bank v. Dykstra 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Matter of Estate of Kerr 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Valley National Bank v. Dykstra 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Portonova v. Wilkinson 627 P.2d 232 Ariz. 1981
Portonova v. Wilkinson 627 P.2d 232 Ariz. 1981
The opposing party must show that evidence is available which justifies going to trial, , and that evidence must be based on personal knowledge and must be admissible at trial.
National Housing Industries, Inc. v. E. L. Jones Development Co. 576 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
National Housing Industries, Inc. v. E. L. Jones Development Co. 576 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Robbins Investment Co. v. Green Rose Associates, Inc., 8 Ariz.App.
Cavanagh v. Schaefer 545 P.2d 416 Ariz. 1976
Cavanagh v. Schaefer 545 P.2d 416 Ariz. 1976
He must show that evidence is available which would justify a trial of the issue, [citations omitted]”
WJ Kroeger Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Company 541 P.2d 385 Ariz. 1975
WJ Kroeger Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Company 541 P.2d 385 Ariz. 1975
Dobson v. Grand Internat’l Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
Byars v. Arizona Public Service Company 539 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Byars v. Arizona Public Service Company 539 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Eng., , Robbins Investment Co. v. Green Rose Associates, Inc., 8 Ariz.App.
City of Phoenix v. Space Data Corporation 534 P.2d 428 Ariz. 1975
City of Phoenix v. Space Data Corporation 534 P.2d 428 Ariz. 1975
Davis v. VUMORE CABLE COMPANY 484 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Davis v. VUMORE CABLE COMPANY 484 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Luplow v. Pasqualetti Properties, Inc.
Nielson v. Savoy 464 P.2d 608 Ariz. 1970
Nielson v. Savoy 464 P.2d 608 Ariz. 1970
In Dobson v. Grand International Broth, of Locomotive Engineers, , , this Court stated: “ * * * It is well settled in the Federal courts and in this jurisdiction that when the party moving for a summary judgment has made a prima facie showing that no genuine issues exist for trial, then the opponent of the motion has the burden to produce sufficient evidence to show th
Robbins Investment Co. v. Green Rose Associates, Inc. 448 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Robbins Investment Co. v. Green Rose Associates, Inc. 448 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Crocker v. Crocker 446 P.2d 226 Ariz. 1968
Crocker v. Crocker 446 P.2d 226 Ariz. 1968
Cordoba v. Wiswall 436 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Cordoba v. Wiswall 436 P.2d 922 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Eng., , : “It is well settled in the Federal Courts and in this jurisdiction that when the party moving for a summary judgment has made a prima facie showing that no genuine issues exist for trial, then the opponent of the motion has the burden to produce sufficient evidence to show that there is an issue

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by