Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Church, 447 P.2d 840.

30 citing documents.

Blk III, LLC v. Skelton 506 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Blk III, LLC v. Skelton 506 P.3d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Newspapers, (finding editorial printed on the newspaper's front page was libelous per se).
Rogers v. Hon Mroz 479 P.3d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rogers v. Hon Mroz 479 P.3d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Reynolds v. Reynolds 294 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Reynolds v. Reynolds 294 P.3d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
(“A person may be liable for what he insinuates as well *318 as for what he says explicitly.”) (internal quotation omitted).
Yetman v. English 811 P.2d 323 Ariz. 1991
Yetman v. English 811 P.2d 323 Ariz. 1991
This court previously examined the factual content of a statement imputing communism in Phoenix Newspapers, , cert.
Yetman v. English 786 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Yetman v. English 786 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
The ruling was based on the holding in Phoenix Newspapers, , cert.
Morris v. Warner 770 P.2d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Morris v. Warner 770 P.2d 359 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
1949, 1965, n. 30 , 80 L.Ed.2d 502, 524, n. 30 (1984); Phoenix Newspapers, -97 , -55 (1968).
Hansen v. Stoll 636 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Hansen v. Stoll 636 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 560 P.2d 1216 Ariz. 1977
Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 560 P.2d 1216 Ariz. 1977
Ross v. Gallant, Farrow & Co., PC 551 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ross v. Gallant, Farrow & Co., PC 551 P.2d 79 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Esquer 550 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Esquer 550 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
See, e. g., , holding that the new double jeopardy rule should apply to “those cases on direct appeal on the date this decision is rendered.” See also Phoenix Newspapers, , cert.
Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 547 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 547 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964) on Arizona defamation law has been thoroughly discussed by the Arizona Supreme Court in Phoenix Newspapers, , and also in this Court’s subsequent opinion involving *278 the same parties, Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Church, 24 Ariz.App.
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Church 537 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Church 537 P.2d 1345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Perry v. Apache Junction Elementary School District 43 Board of Trustees 514 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Perry v. Apache Junction Elementary School District 43 Board of Trustees 514 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Berg v. Hohenstein 479 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Berg v. Hohenstein 479 P.2d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Applying these principles and viewing the language of the notice as a whole and in the light of a reader of average interest (Phoenix Newspapers, , cert.