Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Estate of Milliman, 415 P.2d 877.

91 citing documents.

Hurt v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ. 601 P.2d 1329 Ariz. 1979
Stewart v. Thornton 551 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Stewart v. Thornton 551 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Patterson Motors, Inc. v. Cortez, 2 Ariz.App.
Triste v. Industrial Commission 544 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Triste v. Industrial Commission 544 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
in which the decedent was a bigamist, and a settlement with the putative wife was held not to bind the original wife.
Williams v. Williams 531 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Williams v. Williams 531 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Seely v. Hagen 508 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Seely v. Hagen 508 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Patterson Motors, Inc. v. Cortez, 2 Ariz.App.
Bates & Springer of Arizona, Inc. v. Friermood 507 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1973
Bates & Springer of Arizona, Inc. v. Friermood 507 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1973
Martinez v. Lucky Stores, Inc. 502 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Martinez v. Lucky Stores, Inc. 502 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Huebner v. Deuchle 501 P.2d 417 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Huebner v. Deuchle 501 P.2d 417 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Gray v. Goodson, 61 Wash.2d 319
Solomon v. Harman 489 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1971
Solomon v. Harman 489 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1971
One is a claim for damages to the survivors; the other is for damages to the estate.”
Mims v. Valley National Bank 481 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Mims v. Valley National Bank 481 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
155 , vacated on other grounds
Lueck v. Superior Court, County of Cochise 469 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1970
Lueck v. Superior Court, County of Cochise 469 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1970
for a history of the wrongful death statute.
Reed v. Frey 458 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Reed v. Frey 458 P.2d 386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Under a survival statute (rather than a Lord Campbell’s type act, such as we have in Arizona, , ), there is Tennessee authority that a mother is an “indispensable party” to an action brought by the father for the wrongful death of a child.
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the County of Cochise 457 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the County of Cochise 457 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Edgar v. Garrett 456 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Edgar v. Garrett 456 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Depper v. Depper 451 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Depper v. Depper 451 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Porter v. La Fe, 68 So.2d 602 (Fla.1953); Kicklighter v. Kicklighter, 217 Ga.
City of Flagstaff v. Babbitt 443 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
City of Flagstaff v. Babbitt 443 P.2d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Watson 436 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Watson 436 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Bonnin v. Industrial Commission 432 P.2d 283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Bonnin v. Industrial Commission 432 P.2d 283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
A more detailed statement of the family history may be found in the reported decision of In the Matter of the Estate of Milliman, Deceased
Rogers v. Smith Kline & French Laboratories 429 P.2d 4 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Rogers v. Smith Kline & French Laboratories 429 P.2d 4 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
A. N. S. Properties, Inc. v. Gough Industries, Inc. 427 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1967
A. N. S. Properties, Inc. v. Gough Industries, Inc. 427 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1967
Hitching Post Lodge, , .
Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. v. Kerwin 420 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1966
Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. v. Kerwin 420 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1966
In the recent case of , , this court held: “ * * * We have often stated that this court will sustain a judgment on appeal if it can be sustained upon any theory which is within the issues and supported by the evidence.