Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Evans v. Pickett, 430 P.2d 413.

57 citing documents.

Kelch v. Courson 447 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1968
We think the preferable form is that in the event of contributory neglignce the jury ‘should’ find for the defendant.” , , we admitted that the words “the law would leave them where it finds them” tended to confuse the issue, but we approved the instruction in spite of those words, and re-affirmed our approval of the use of the word “should,” in connection with the jury’s duty to find for the defendant.
Worthington v. Funk 442 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Worthington v. Funk 442 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Judge *601 Molloy, writing for the Court in Jones, and reviewing the opinions of our Supreme Court, , which was released by the Supreme Court the week before Judge IVtolloy’s opinion, ■concluded that the questioned instruction was a correct statement of the law.
Orlando v. Northcutt 441 P.2d 58 Ariz. 1968
Orlando v. Northcutt 441 P.2d 58 Ariz. 1968
involving a motor vehicle accident and a possible violation of a motor vehicle statute, we held that it was not *300 error when the trial court read the statute to the jury and “in effect, told the jury that a violation of that statute was negligence, and, if it were a proximate cause, the jury
Riley v. Jones 430 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Riley v. Jones 430 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
As this opinion was about to be released, , the holding of which we read to be again supportive of this proposition.