Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Town of Scottsdale v. State, 405 P.2d 871.

34 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen Ariz. 2025
State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen Ariz. 2025
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg Ariz. 2024
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg Ariz. 2024
Pickrell, )); S. Ariz. Home Builders Ass’n, 254 Ariz. at 286 ¶ 31 (“Statutory interpretation requires us to determine the meaning of the words the legislature chose to use.”); (“Where the statute is unambiguous, the courts will only apply the language used and n
Doe v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Doe v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Weitz Co. v. Heth 314 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Weitz Co. v. Heth 314 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
In Re Estate of Winn 237 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Estate of Winn 237 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Copper Hills Enterprises, Ltd. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 153 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Copper Hills Enterprises, Ltd. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 153 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Pickrell, -88 , -75 (1965) (holding that the signature requirement was an “indispensable condition precedent” and the failure to comply with it deprived the town of jurisdiction to annex); Cornman Tweedy 560, -8, ¶ 31 , -16 (App.2006) (holding th
Cornman Tweedy 560, LLC v. City of Casa Grande 137 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Cornman Tweedy 560, LLC v. City of Casa Grande 137 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
-85 , -73 (1965) (requiring only substantial compliance with petition provision of § 9-471).
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr. 7 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr. 7 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Pickrell, , ) (“As a rule of statutory construction, we will not read into a statute something which is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute *158 itself.”).
Town of Miami v. City of Globe 985 P.2d 1035 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Town of Miami v. City of Globe 985 P.2d 1035 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Pickrell, , State ex rel.
Desert Wide Cabling & Installation, Inc. v. Wells Fargo & Co., N.A. 958 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Desert Wide Cabling & Installation, Inc. v. Wells Fargo & Co., N.A. 958 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
City of Tempe v. Fleming 815 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
City of Tempe v. Fleming 815 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Moorehead v. Arnold 637 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Moorehead v. Arnold 637 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Denny 569 P.2d 303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Denny 569 P.2d 303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Taylor v. City of Chandler 498 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Taylor v. City of Chandler 498 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
” We adopt the reasoning of this decision as dispositive of plaintiffs’ first question.
City of Safford v. Town of Thatcher 495 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
City of Safford v. Town of Thatcher 495 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Fry v. Mayor and City Council of Sierra Vista 466 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Fry v. Mayor and City Council of Sierra Vista 466 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Pickrell, , ; 2 McQuillin Municipal Corporations (3rd ed.) § 7.30; see also Manning v. Reilly, 2 Ariz.App.
State v. Town of Scottsdale 407 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1965
State v. Town of Scottsdale 407 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1965