Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Mesa v. Killingsworth, 394 P.2d 410.
-
State v. Wise
671 P.2d 909
Ariz. 1983
("It is * * well settled that construction of a statute should be favored which will render every word operative rather than a construction which makes some words idle and nugatory.")
- Boulware v. Carbajal 673 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
-
Boulware v. Carbajal
673 P.2d 316
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
appellants contend that the amendment to the statute merely construed and clarified the statute and should be accepted as a legislative declaration of the intent of the original statute.
- Dupnik v. MacDougall 664 P.2d 189 Ariz. 1983
- Dupnik v. MacDougall 664 P.2d 189 Ariz. 1983
- Marlar v. State 666 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Marlar v. State 666 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Knoell Bros. Const. v. State, Dept. of Rev. 644 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- Knoell Bros. Const. v. State, Dept. of Rev. 644 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Fendler 622 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
State v. Fendler
622 P.2d 23
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
While we are not bound by administrative interpretation, “where long continued and in cases of ambiguity we will acquiesce therein.” , , 80 A.L.R.2d 949 (1961).
- O'Malley Lumber Co. v. Riley 613 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- O'Malley Lumber Co. v. Riley 613 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Patchin 610 P.2d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Patchin 610 P.2d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Sandblom v. Corbin 608 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
Sandblom v. Corbin
608 P.2d 317
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
The cardinal rule of statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the intent of the lawmaking body, , Phoenix Title & , and such construction is ordinarily a question of law.
- Building Products Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 604 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
Building Products Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
604 P.2d 1148
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
v. Leslie, , , , Odle v. Shamrock Dairy of Phoenix, Inc., 7 Ariz.App., 515 , See, A.R.S.
- Dearing v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 589 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- Dearing v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 589 P.2d 446 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- Sterman v. Transamerica Title Insurance 580 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- Sterman v. Transamerica Title Insurance 580 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- Arizona State Board of Accountancy v. Keebler 564 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
-
Arizona State Board of Accountancy v. Keebler
564 P.2d 928
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
v. Leslie, , , , Odle v. Shamrock Dairy of Phoenix, Inc., 7 Ariz.App.
- B & P CPNCRETE, INC. v. Turnbow 561 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
-
B & P CPNCRETE, INC. v. Turnbow
561 P.2d 329
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Neil B. McGinnis Equipment Co. v. Henson, 2 Ariz.App.
- Smith v. Pima County Law Enforcement Council 548 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1976
- Smith v. Pima County Law Enforcement Council 548 P.2d 1151 Ariz. 1976
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1976
-
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission
547 P.2d 470
Ariz. 1976
P.2d 410 (1964); , , P.2d 540 (1953)
- State v. RELLA VERDE APTS., INC., NO. XXX-XX-XXXX 544 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. RELLA VERDE APTS., INC., NO. XXX-XX-XXXX 544 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Rella Verde Apartments, Inc. 544 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Rella Verde Apartments, Inc. 544 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- Ordway v. Pickrell 543 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1975
- Ordway v. Pickrell 543 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1975
- Ross v. Industrial Commission 540 P.2d 1234 Ariz. 1975
- Ross v. Industrial Commission 540 P.2d 1234 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Vondohlen 538 P.2d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
-
State v. Vondohlen
538 P.2d 1163
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
P.2d 410 (1964), it was stated: “An amendment which, in effect, construes and clarifies a prior statute will be accepted as the legislative declaration of the original act.” 96 Ariz. at 297 , 394 P.2d at 414 .
- Watkins Cigarette Service, Inc. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 526 P.2d 708 Ariz. 1974
- Watkins Cigarette Service, Inc. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 526 P.2d 708 Ariz. 1974
- Lombardo v. Pollock 521 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Lombardo v. Pollock 521 P.2d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- State v. Buchanan 518 P.2d 108 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Buchanan 518 P.2d 108 Ariz. 1974
- Watkins Cigarette Service, Inc. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 517 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Watkins Cigarette Service, Inc. v. Arizona State Tax Commission 517 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. Reiser 512 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1973