Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Waller v. Industrial Commission, 406 P.2d 197.
- Raymer v. Industrial Commission 501 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Raymer v. Industrial Commission 501 P.2d 25 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Bishop v. Industrial Commission 495 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
-
Bishop v. Industrial Commission
495 P.2d 482
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
the Supreme Court stated: “ .
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Corr v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Corr v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Matthews v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Matthews v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Lee v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Lee v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- O'Neal v. Industrial Commission 485 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
O'Neal v. Industrial Commission
485 P.2d 1
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The case, , cited by petitioner, is applicable in that it cites the rule that a causal connection between an accident and injury not clearly apparent to a layman can usually only be determined by expert medical evidence.
- Smith v. Industrial Commission 473 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Smith v. Industrial Commission 473 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Vinyard v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Vinyard v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Piepkorn v. Industrial Commission 454 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- Valdon v. Industrial Commission 447 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1968
-
Valdon v. Industrial Commission
447 P.2d 239
Ariz. 1968
Seven doctors testified, without exception, that they found no functional loss or disability attributable to the claimant’s industrial accident, and this court held in Waller v. Industrial Commission, 99 Ariz, 15, , that “ * * * the conclusion of the Medical Board is not contradicted by the medical testimony * * * it was not established affirmatively that the injury caused any disability.” Claimant argues that the Commission abused its discretion in overruling the findings of its referee.
- Malinski v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1968
- Malinski v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1968
- Arnott v. Industrial Commission 438 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1968
- Arnott v. Industrial Commission 438 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1968
- Mickelson v. Industrial Commission 437 P.2d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
-
Mickelson v. Industrial Commission
437 P.2d 666
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
at 21 , at 201 (1965), the Court said: “Under the provision of A.R.S.
- Malinski v. Industrial Commission 438 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Malinski v. Industrial Commission
438 P.2d 38
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Nye v. Industrial Commission, 5 Ariz.App.
- Waller v. Industrial Commission 431 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Waller v. Industrial Commission
431 P.2d 689
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
That award and subsequent awards denying him permanent disability have been carried to the Arizona Supreme Court in three causes