Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite McKinley v. Reilly, 393 P.2d 268.

36 citing documents.

Lincoln v. Holt 156 P.3d 438 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Lincoln v. Holt 156 P.3d 438 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
See *28 Ariz. Const, art. 4, pt 1, § 1(1) (“The legislative authority of the State shall be vested in the Legislature____”); Adams, 74 Ariz. at 281 , 247 P.2d at 625 (“Except as legislation may be prohibited by or repugnant to other provisions of the Constitution or the Federal Constitution and laws, the authority of the Legislature is absolute____”); , (“The police power of the State is the power vested in its legislature to make, ordain and establish all manner of wholesome and reasonable laws
State v. Gomez 127 P.3d 873 Ariz. 2006
Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 56 P.3d 28 Ariz. 2002
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
New Times, , , appeal dismissed, 381 U.S. 276 , 85 S.Ct.
Matter of Adoption of Hadtrath 592 P.2d 1262 Ariz. 1979
Matter of Adoption of Hadtrath 592 P.2d 1262 Ariz. 1979
appeal dismissed, 381 U.S. 276 , 85 S.Ct.
State v. Burns 591 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Burns 591 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
appeal dismissed, 381 U.S. 276 , Σ5 S.Ct.
State v. Powers 571 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1977
State v. Powers 571 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1977
Town of Wickenburg v. State 565 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Town of Wickenburg v. State 565 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
appeal dismissed, 381 U.S. 276 , 85 S.Ct.
Landgraff v. Wagner 546 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Landgraff v. Wagner 546 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Jay v. Kreigh 518 P.2d 122 Ariz. 1974
Jay v. Kreigh 518 P.2d 122 Ariz. 1974
Town of South Tucson v. Board of Supervisors of Pima County, 52 * , , appeal dismissed 381 U.S. 276 , 85 S.Ct.
Nelson v. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. 505 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Nelson v. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. 505 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Wadsworth 505 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1973
State v. Wadsworth 505 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1973
Accord, , appeal dismissed, 381 U.S. 276 , 85 S.Ct.
State v. Direct Sellers Association 494 P.2d 361 Ariz. 1972
State v. Direct Sellers Association 494 P.2d 361 Ariz. 1972
When such cases appear in the trial courts, it will be their duty to recognize the presumption of constitutionality which attends all acts of the legislature, and to indulge every intendment in favor of the act’s , ; to choose a construction which will result in its constitutionality’s being upheld, if there are two ways to construe them — , ; to resolve all doubts in favor of the act’s constitutionality Board of Regents of University of Arizona
Arizona State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers v. Perlman 485 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Arizona State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers v. Perlman 485 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
decided by the Arizona Supreme Court, which dealt with the statute in question.
Hall v. Mertz 480 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Hall v. Mertz 480 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Campbell v. Superior Court 479 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1971
Campbell v. Superior Court 479 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1971
The state acting pursuant to its police powers may “make, ordain and establish all manner of wholesome and reasonable laws, statutes and ordinances either with penalties or without as shall be judged to be good for the welfare of the state and its residents.”
Arizona Fence Contractors Ass'n v. City of Phoenix Advisory & Appeals Board 436 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Arizona Fence Contractors Ass'n v. City of Phoenix Advisory & Appeals Board 436 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Drachman v. Jay 417 P.2d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Drachman v. Jay 417 P.2d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Salinas v. Kahn 407 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Salinas v. Kahn 407 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965