Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Cammeron v. Industrial Commission, 405 P.2d 802.
- Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- Enyart v. Industrial Commission 458 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- Malinski v. Industrial Commission 438 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Malinski v. Industrial Commission
438 P.2d 38
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
•f» “Suffice it to say that the' findings are too indefinite and the award is set aside.”
- Baxter v. Industrial Commission 430 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
-
Baxter v. Industrial Commission
430 P.2d 735
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
: “When medical opinions, based on matters peculiarly within the realm of scientific knowledge are uncontroverted, as in the instant case, such opinions cannot be arbitrarily rejected by the Commission (citations omitted)”.
- Fernandez v. Industrial Commission 424 P.2d 451 Ariz. 1967
-
Fernandez v. Industrial Commission
424 P.2d 451
Ariz. 1967
this court stated: “ * * * The findings did not mention mental disability, and although it is not essential under our statute that specific findings of fact be made on every issue which might be involved in a hearing, the findings as made must be of such a nature that they necessarily dispose of