Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. Herman, 442 P.2d 835.

37 citing documents.

City of Phoenix v. John E. Garretson 322 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2014
City of Phoenix v. John E. Garretson 322 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2014
Herman (Defnet I), –92, –39 (1968) (McFarland, C.J., specially concurring) (reiterating his view that prior cases should not apply to controlled-access highway cases).
City of Phoenix v. Garretson 302 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
City of Phoenix v. Garretson 302 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Herman, , (recognizing it is the jury’s responsibility to “answer the fundamental question ...
City of Phoenix v. Wilson 21 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2001
City of Phoenix v. Wilson 21 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2001
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Superior Court 941 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Superior Court 941 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Ellis 838 P.2d 1310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Filler 812 P.2d 620 Ariz. 1991
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Filler 812 P.2d 620 Ariz. 1991
Herman [I], -90 , -37 (1968); see also Miller, 317 U.S. at 373 , 63 S.Ct.
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
State ex rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State ex rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Selective Resources v. Superior Court 700 P.2d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Selective Resources v. Superior Court 700 P.2d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Miller v. Palmer 691 P.2d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Miller v. Palmer 691 P.2d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Herman, , the misconduct was so serious that no admonition could undo it, , or, the jury was allowed to decide the matter based on a fundamental error, such as an improper legal theory.
Stockholders & Spouses of Carioca Co. v. Superior Court 687 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1984
Stockholders & Spouses of Carioca Co. v. Superior Court 687 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1984
City of Scottsdale v. Church of Holy Cross Lutheran 646 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
City of Scottsdale v. Church of Holy Cross Lutheran 646 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Herman, , it is error to value the land taken on the basis of an artificial average unit value unless the reality of the case requires such a valuation.
Arizona State Land Department v. State Ex Rel. Herman 547 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1976
Arizona State Land Department v. State Ex Rel. Herman 547 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1976
Jennings v. Roberts Scott & Co., Inc. 546 P.2d 343 Ariz. 1976
Jennings v. Roberts Scott & Co., Inc. 546 P.2d 343 Ariz. 1976
Herman, , Pool v. Peil, 22 Ariz.App.
City of Tucson v. Allen 510 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
City of Tucson v. Allen 510 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
City of Tucson v. Rickles 505 P.2d 253 Ariz. 1973
City of Tucson v. Rickles 505 P.2d 253 Ariz. 1973
See Defnet Land & , Board of Regents v. Cannon, supra.
City of Tucson v. Rickles 488 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
City of Tucson v. Rickles 488 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Herman, , : * * * * # “Ordinarily, we would not consider a claim of error where the trial court was not given the opportunity to correct the error prior to the appeal, but the method of evaluation by the appraisers for the State is so fundamentally unfair and unjust as to permit no other conclusion than th
Tucson Title Insurance Co. v. State Ex Rel. Herman 489 P.2d 299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Tucson Title Insurance Co. v. State Ex Rel. Herman 489 P.2d 299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Herman, , the court recognized that it is prejudicial error to value the land taken on the basis of an artificial average unit value for the entire tract unless the actualities of the case accord with such a method of valuation.
Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. Herman 480 P.2d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. Herman 480 P.2d 1013 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971